帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪中“明知”的扩张性解释及其司法推定  

The Expansive Interpretation and Judicial Presumption of“Knowing”in the Crime of Assisting Information Network Crime

作　　者：吴畔容 Wu Panrong(Guizhou Minzu University,Guiyang Guizhou 550025)

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2023年第2期25-29,共5页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

基　　金：贵州民族大学2021年度校级民族法治研究生教育创新基地课题《认罪认罚案件量刑机制实证研究——以G省500份判决书为分析样本》(项目编号:20212MZC008)的研究成果。

摘　　要：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的立法增设是为了有效遏制网络犯罪。本罪的正确适用前提是对主观构成要件中的“明知”准确解读。对于“明知”的认定存在“明确知道”说、“明确知道+可能知道”说、“明确知道+应当知道”说的争论。传统学说对本罪“明知”的理解过于狭窄。应当对本罪的立法原意及保护法益进行考察“。明知”包含“可能知道”符合合目的性解释原理与司法解释的规范要求。对“应当知道”应作出扩张性解读,其不仅属于司法用语,也有实体法上认定犯罪故意“明知”的意义。The legislative addition of the crime of assisting information network crime is to effectively curb network crime.The premise of the correct application of this crime is the accurate interpretation of“knowing”in the subjective elements.In fact,there are many arguments on the identification of“knowing”,and the traditional doctrine’s understanding of the“knowing”of this crime is too narrow.Therefore,The original legislative intention and the legal interests protection of this crime should be studied“.Knowing”includes“may know”that in line with the principle of purposive interpretation and the normative requirements of judicial interpretation.And the“should know”should be interpreted expansively,which not only belongs to the judicial term,but also has the meaning of“knowing”that the crime is deliberately determined in substantive law.

关 键 词：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 明知 扩张性解释 推定规则 

分 类 号：DF626[政治法律—刑法学]