论数据集合的反不正当竞争法保护  

On Protection of Datasets by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law

作　　者：张素伦[1] Zhang Sulun(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan 450052)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450052

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2023年第5期57-67,共11页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：2018年国家社会科学基金一般项目“数据驱动型垄断行为法律规制研究”(项目编号:18BFX189);2021年河南省高校科技创新团队支持计划项目“数据垄断防控”(项目编号:211RTSTHN012)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：公开、非独创性数据集合具有显著的商业价值,承载着经营者的竞争性权益。数据集合的法律保护存在权利赋予路径和行为规制路径两种模式,基于数据集合法律保护实践和平衡数据保护与利用的需要,我国目前宜选择行为规制路径,运用《反不正当竞争法》对数据集合进行保护。由于《反不正当竞争法》“互联网条款”的适用出现失灵,“一般条款”的适用具有不确定性,《反不正当竞争法》修订时应增设数据集合保护条款。针对这一专门条款进行设计,一方面要明确数据集合不正当竞争行为的构成要件,另一方面要以“适用除外”的方式划定数据集合法律保护的限度。Publicly accessible and unoriginal datasets have significant commercial value and carry the competitive rights and interests of operators.There are two modes of the legal protection of datasets:property right protection path and behavior regulation path.Based on the practice of legal protection of datasets and the need of balancing data protection and utilization,it is appropriate for China to choose behavior regulation path and apply the Anti-unfair Competition Law to protect datasets.Due to the failure of the application of“internet provision”of the Anti-unfair Competition Law and uncertainty of the application of“general provision”,a datasets protection provision should be added when the Anti-unfair Competition Law is amended.In view of devising this special provision,on the one hand,the constituent elements of unfair competition of datasets should be clarified,and on the other hand,the limit of legal protection of datasets should be defined in the way of“exclusions of application”.

关 键 词：数据集合 反不正当竞争法 竞争性权益 商业道德 

分 类 号：D922.29[政治法律—经济法学]