韦伯作品统一性与学科身份转换之谜——方法论学说线索下的韦伯思想脉络探究  

Thematic Unity in Max Weber’s Works and the Mystery of His Discipline Identity Conversion:On Weber’s Ideological System Based on His Methodological Theories

作　　者：张翼飞[1] ZHANG Yi-fei(College of Humanities and Social Sciences,Harbin Engineering University,Harbin 150001,China)

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨工程大学人文社会科学学院,哈尔滨150001

出　　处：《学习与探索》2023年第8期57-69,188,共14页Study & Exploration

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“军事社会学的理论脉络及其本土化构建研究”(22ASH003)。

摘　　要：对韦伯方法论学说的忽视是造成当今韦伯诠释危机的重要原因。作为国民经济学家,韦伯试图用“社会经济学”的设想破解国民经济学的方法论之争,这种设想以构造“诸领域”的理想类型为核心,以经济领域与其他社会领域的“亲和”与“紧张”关系为分析目标,并最终服务于韦伯的价值关联——为何偏偏西方产生了现代理性资本主义。韦伯将构造理想类型的任务赋予了社会学,并认为其在方法论上先于历史研究,因此后期他将社会学作为了研究重点。由于每个理想类型本质上是一个主观意义类型,这就实现了“理解”的目的。韦伯的思想遗产为今日社会学破解“剩余学科”之地位提供了丰厚资源。The traditional Weber interpretation paradigm ignores the importance of Weber’s methodological theories,which leads to an interpretation dilemma.Weber,who was originally a professor of national economics,wanted to bridge the methodological debates in national economics with the idea of“social economics”.This idea focused on the construction of ideal types in“societal domains”and aimed at the analysis of affinity and tension between the domains,and ultimately served Weber’s value relevance---Why the West had produced modern rational capitalism.Weber assigned the task of constructing ideal types to sociology,believed that it preceded historical research in methodology,and then took it as the focus in his later career.Each ideal type is essentially a subjective meaning type,which realizes the purpose of understanding.Weber’s ideological heritage provides abundant resources for today’s sociology to break the status of the remaining disciplines.

关 键 词：韦伯著作统一性 韦伯方法论 韦伯思想脉络 理解社会学 国民经济学历史学派 

分 类 号：D091[政治法律—政治学]