检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王静[1] 高应萍[1] 梅丹 马奎[1] 梅良英 房晓光 WANG Jing;GAO Yingping;MEI Dan;MA Kui;MEI Liangying;FANG Xiaoguang(Hubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Wuhan 430079 China;Comprehensive Supervision Bureau of Hubei Health Commission,Wuhan 430079 China)
机构地区:[1]湖北省疾病预防控制中心,湖北武汉430079 [2]湖北省卫健委综合监督局,湖北武汉430079
出 处:《中国辐射卫生》2023年第3期240-244,共5页Chinese Journal of Radiological Health
摘 要:目的分析1例职业性放射性肿瘤诊断过程中遇到的问题和处理方法。方法在剂量估算时选取剂量转换方式,将个人剂量当量、皮肤吸收剂量、文献检测数据均转换为红骨髓吸收剂量,并计算PC 95%可信上限。结果劳动者放射致癌病因概率PC 95%可信上限为66.38%,可判断为放射性肿瘤;剂量估算过程存在个人剂量数据缺失;现行剂量估算标准无床边拍片和CT工作类型且剂量转公式不够完善。结论在职业性放射性肿瘤判断过程中,剂量估算结果存在一定不确定性,亟需制订并颁布符合目前放射诊疗技术和设备进展、更具操作性的相关剂量估算标准。Objective To analyze the problems and solutions in the diagnosis of a patient with occupational radiogenic neoplasms.Methods The dose conversion method was selected in dose estimation.Personal dose equivalent,skin absorbed dose,and reported detection data were converted into red bone marrow absorbed dose.The upper 95%confidence limit of the probability of causation(PC 95%)was calculated.Results The PC 95%of cancer due to radiation in the worker was 66.38%,which suggested occupational radiogenic neoplasms.Personal dose data were missing in dose estimation.The current dose estimation standard lacked bedside radiography and CT operation type,and the dose conversion formula was not perfect.Conclusion In the judgment of occupational radiogenic neoplasms,the estimated dose showed uncertainty.There is an urgent need to formulate and promulgate dose estimation standards that are operational and in line with the current development of radiological diagnosis and treatment technology and equipment.
分 类 号:R144.1[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.159.3