超越政党多元主义:论霸权党制及其类型学  

Beyond Party Pluralism:Revisiting Hegemonic Party Systems and Its Typology

作　　者：柴宝勇 石春林 Chai Baoyong;Shi Chunlin

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学党内法规与国家监察研究中心,102488 [2]中国社会科学院大学政府管理学院,102488 [3]中国社会科学院大学党内法规与国家监察研究中心学术委员会,102488

出　　处：《世界社会科学》2023年第3期45-73,242,243,共31页SOCIAL SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“坚定对中国特色社会主义政治制度的自信研究”(22ZDA065)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：政党多元主义是内生型政党(体制)的价值规范,一直以来,政党多元主义一直被西方民主理论中的政党理论视作一种自然。然而,那些后发现代化、仍需完成政治系统重构的政治共同体的政党(国家)体制建立逻辑并非政党多元主义。运用比较历史分析和过程追踪法,通过对比19世纪末—20世纪初的俄苏、20世纪初—20世纪中叶的波兰和中国,可以发现一种非竞争性的双层政党(国家)体制的生成逻辑。这种体制可以被称为“共识型领导党制”,它不应被视作一种与主导党制相对立的非民主类型,而应从国家建构的角度考虑其政党(国家)体制类型学。Party pluralism has long been considered an intrinsic value norm of endogenous political parties and their systems,and it has been commonly viewed as a natural element within democratic theories of party politics.However,for political communities that are still undergoing modernization and require political system reconstruction,the logic behind the establishment of their party-state systems does not necessarily align with party pluralism.By employing comparative historical analysis and process tracing methodology,this study compares three cases:late 19th to early 20th century Russia,early 20th century to mid-20th century Poland,and China.Through this analysis,a prevailing logic of non-competitive dual-party-state systems is discovered.We refer to this type of system as"a consensual leadership party system"and argue that it should not be seen as a non-democratic alternative to dominant party systems,but rather as a typology of party-state systems from the perspective of state construction.

关 键 词：霸权党制 共识型领导党制 政党多元主义 比较政党政治 

分 类 号：D05[政治法律—政治学]