检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周泽将[1] 汪顺 张悦 ZHOU Ze-jiang;WANG Shun;ZHANG Yue(School of Business,Anhui University;School of Accounting,Zhejiang Gongshang University)
机构地区:[1]安徽大学商学院 [2]浙江工商大学会计学院
出 处:《中国工业经济》2023年第7期103-121,共19页China Industrial Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目“组织权威、经济独立性与监事会治理研究:理论框架与实证检验”(批准号72172001);安徽省高等学校杰出青年基金资助项目“中国情境下上市公司ESG表现的经济后果研究”(批准号2022AH020001);安徽省自然科学基金优秀青年基金项目“国有企业公司治理前沿问题研究”(批准号2208085Y22)。
摘 要:2018年1月1日正式实施的《环境保护税法》是税制绿色化转型的核心标志,其政策效应值得关注。本文使用文本分析法计算企业环保新闻文本情绪,基于双重差分法研究《环境保护税法》实施的微观政策效应与传导路径。研究发现,《环境保护税法》的实施显著改善了重污染企业的环境绩效,环保新闻文本情绪提升明显,且上述结论在经过一系列稳健性检验后依然成立;在政策传导路径上,《环境保护税法》的实施有利于企业从“观念治理”“末端治理”“源头治理”三个方向系统改善其环境绩效,但在政府环保关注度较低、管理层决策视域短视程度较高以及绿色转型基础较差的企业组内,《环境保护税法》实施对企业环境绩效的改善效应显著弱化。经济后果检验发现,企业依据《环境保护税法》积极改善其环境绩效,不仅能够充分缓解企业风险,还能够提升企业价值和全要素生产率,实现高质量发展。本文的研究回应了宏观税制绿色化能否真正助推微观企业绿色发展这一基本问题,为进一步优化相关政策法规提供了参考。China has entered a new stage of development,which highlights the importance of fully implementing the new development concept that“lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets”.To actively and methodically propel China’s transition towards environmentally sustainable growth,we must not only focus on partial equilibrium,but also unravel the underlying economic mechanisms and adopt comprehensive strategies.Within China’s economic governance framework,taxation stands as the cornerstone.The official enactment of the Environmental Protection Tax Law of the People’s Republic of China on January 1,2018 signifies a pivotal moment in the greening of the tax governance system,necessitating due analysis of its consequential micro-policy effects.This study analyzes environmental news texts using text analysis to measure sentiment and employs the difference-in-differences(DID)method to examine the micro-policy effects and transmission pathways of the Environmental Protection Tax Law.The results indicate that the law significantly improves the environmental performance of heavily-polluting enterprises,as reflected in the positive change in sentiment of environmental news texts.The policy’s impact is evident across three dimensions of conceptual,end-of-pipe,and source treatment.However,in business groups with low government’s environmental attention,shorter-sighted management decision-making,and a weaker foundation for green transformation,the law’s positive impact on environmental performance is diminished significantly.The economic consequence analysis demonstrates that enterprises complying with the policy intention of the Environmental Protection Tax Law and actively improving environmental performance can not only fully alleviate enterprise risks,but also enhance enterprise value and total factor productivity(TFP),achieving high-quality development.This paper contributes to existing literature in three aspects.Firstly,it examines the direct economic consequences of the Environmental Protection Tax
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229