检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张绍杰 何鸣[2] ZHANG Shaojie;HE Ming
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学外国语学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]东北师范大学外国语学院,吉林长春130024
出 处:《外语与外语教学》2023年第3期1-11,145,共12页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
摘 要:语句同义关系区别于句法同义关系,前者是具有相同交际功能的句子话语在语言使用中构建的意义关系,而后者是语言系统内部具有相同命题的句子之间建立的意义关系。本研究在认知语用学视域下考察语句同义关系。研究发现,语句同义关系是在认知语境下意义动态识解过程中构建的,而且语句同义关系的构建限制在同一概念结构的场域范围内,更重要的是,语句同义关系是围绕说话人意图构建的,其构建的过程体现诸如信息凸显、观察视点以及主观性的认知语用特征。本研究突破了传统语义学在语言系统内对句法同义关系解释的局限,同时揭示了认知与语用的互动关系。Sentence utterance synonymy is distinguishable from syntactic synonymy in that the former is the meaning relationship constructed by sentence utterances with the same communicative function in language use and the latter is the meaning relationship established by sentences with the same proposition in the language system.This paper examines sentence utterance synonymy from a cognitive pragmatic approach.It finds that sentence utterance synonymy is constructed in the process of dynamic meaning construal in the cognitive context,and its construction is constrained within the domain of the same conceptual structure,and more importantly,it demonstrates that sentence utterance synonymy is constructed centrally in connection with the speaker's intention with the cognitive pragmatic properties like salience,viewpoint,and subjectivity manifested in the process of its construction.This study goes beyond the traditional semantics in explaining syntactic synonymy in the language system and meanwhile it reveals the interaction of cognition and pragmatics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90