检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭小芬 童临风 赵茜[3] Tan Xiaofen;Tong Linfeng;Zhao Qian(Beihang University,Beijing;Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing)
机构地区:[1]北京航空航天大学经济管理学院 [2]中央财经大学金融学院 [3]中央财经大学国际经济与贸易学院
出 处:《经济社会体制比较》2023年第4期27-39,共13页Comparative Economic & Social Systems
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“负利率时代金融系统性风险的识别和防范研究”(项目编号:20&ZD101)。
摘 要:金融危机后,各国广泛实施逆周期的宏观审慎政策以维持金融体系稳定。同时,随着金融全球化进程的不断推进,金融机构受到各国多层次的审慎监管,由此产生的溢出效应不容忽视。文章研究了在正常情况及美国货币政策冲击下,非银行金融机构资金流出国与资金流入国宏观审慎政策对跨境基金资本流动的不同影响。研究发现,在正常情况下资金流出国宏观审慎政策对跨境资本流动的影响更为明显,而在美国货币政策对跨境资本流动产生冲击时,资金流入国宏观审慎政策更有助于缓解冲击造成的不利影响。To keep the financial system stable after the financial crisis,many nations have adopted countercyclical macroprudential measures.Additionally,as financial globalization continues to expand,financial institutions are subject to multilevel prudential supervision of many nations,and the ripple effects of prudential regulation cannot be disregarded.This study examines the various impacts of macroprudential regulations on international capital flows between the funding inflow and outflow countries for non-bank financial institutions under both normal circumstances and shocks to the U.S.monetary policy.It is discovered that macroprudential policies in the inflow countries are more effective at reducing the negative effects of shocks caused by U.S.monetary policies when shocks to cross-border capital flows occur,whereas the impact of macroprudential policies on cross-border capital flows in the outflow countries is more pronounced under normal conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222