检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:俞祖成 丁柯尹 YU Zucheng;DING Keyin(School of International Relations and Public Affairs,Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai 200083,China)
机构地区:[1]上海外国语大学国际关系与公共事务学院,上海200083
出 处:《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第5期1-10,共10页Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:上海外国语大学青年教师科研创新团队项目(2020SWQ10)。
摘 要:践行“人民城市”重要理念和构建“人人有责、人人尽责、人人享有”的社会治理共同体目标,需要厘清社区居民的权利与义务关系问题。基于上海社区治理实践的观察,以“法的本位理论”为分析视角,可发现社区居民的权利与义务关系的理想状态应呈现为“居民义务的履行促进其权利的实现,居民权利的行使促进其义务履行的自觉,进而实现居民权利与义务的相对均衡”。然而现实景象却与理想状态存在较大的差距,社区居民的权利与义务关系处于失衡状态。未来,如何在权力的支配力不断得到增强的同时,有效推进城市社区的居民自治,并进一步提升居民个体的自主性和责任感,将是破解居民权利与义务失衡问题的基本思路。To implement the concept of“people’s city”and to build a community of social governance in which“everyone fulfills his/her due obligations while enjoying deserved rights”,it is necessary to clarify the relationship between the rights and obligations of community residents.Based on the Community governance in Shanghai,from the perspective of“law-standard theory”,the ideal relationship should be that“the fulfillment of residents’obligations promotes the realization of their rights,and the exercise of their rights promotes their awareness to fulfill their obligations,thus striking a relative balance between rights and obligations”.However,there is a big gap between the reality and the ideal,because the rights and obligations are unbalanced.In the future,how to promote both the autonomy of urban community residents and their subjectivity and responsibility in the context of increased power control is the fundamental key to addressing the imbalance of residents’rights and obligations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62