改良疗养路径干预方法与传统疗养方法对涉核人员疗养效果的对比研究  

Comparative study on the convalescent effect of the improved healing path intervention method and the traditional convalescent method on the nuclear personnel

作　　者：闫明启 李小飞 戚秀中 YAN Ming-qi;LI Xiao-fei;QI Xiu-zhong(The Fourth Recuperation Area,the Navy Qingdao Special Service Recuperation Center,Qingdao Shandong 266071,China)

机构地区：[1]海军青岛特勤疗养中心第四疗养区,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《临床和实验医学杂志》2023年第16期1791-1792,F0003,共3页Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine

基　　金：青岛市市南科技专项(编号:2012-5-027-YY)。

摘　　要：目的研究改良疗养路径干预方法与传统疗养方法对涉核人员疗养效果。方法采用前瞻性队列研究方法,将2019年3月至2021年2月在海军青岛特勤疗养中心疗养的620名涉核疗养员按照随机数字表发分为两组,每组各310名。观察组实施改良疗养路径干预方法,对照组实施传统疗养方法,干预周期30 d。通过比较两组人员在心理状态、睡眠状况、疲劳状况、保健防病能力及服务满意度等方面的差异,对两种方法的疗养效果进行评价。结果干预后,观察组与对照组人员焦虑自评量表(SAS),抑郁自评量表(SDS)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)量表及疲劳量表-14(FS-14)评分均较干预前明显降低,且观察组SAS、SDS、PSQI、FS-14评分分别为(30.47±7.58)、(31.39±4.68)、(7.50±2.43)、(3.07±3.16)分,均低于对照组[(38.09±8.48)、(34.98±5.36)、(8.87±2.18)、(3.88±2.98)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组人员参与保健防病训练课时数及疗养服务质量评价表评分分别为(6.00±2.00)课时、(9.10±0.80)分,均高于对照组[(2.00±1.00)课时、(7.30±1.10)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论实施改良疗养路径干预方法能够明显提高涉核疗养员的疗养效果,进而提升整体疗养服务水平,增强疗养员对疗养服务的满意程度。Objective To study the effect of improved healing path intervention method and traditional convalescence method on the convalescence of nuclear personnel.Methods Prospective cohort study was followed-up among 620 nuclear-related convalescents who participated in convalescence from March 2019 to February 2021 in the Navy Qingdao Special Service Recuperation Center.The subjects were divided into two groups according to the random number table,310 in each group.The observation group implemented improved healing path intervention method,while the control group implemented traditional rehabilitation methods,with an intervention period of 30 days.The differences of psychological state,sleep condition,fatigue condition,the health care and disease prevention ability and service satisfaction were compared to evaluate the convalescent effect of the two methods.Results After the intervention,the scores of self rating anxiety scale(SAS),self rating depression scale(SDS),Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI)and fatigue scale-14(FS-14)in the observation group and the control group were significantly lower than those before the intervention,and the scores of SAS,SDS,PSQI and FS-14 in the observation group were(30.47±7.58),(31.39±4.68),(7.50±2.43)and(3.07±3.16)scores,respectively,which were lower than those in the control group(38.09±8.48),(34.98±5.36),(8.87±2.18),and(3.88±2.98)scores,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The number of hours of participating in health and disease prevention training and the score of the recuperation service quality evaluation form for the observation group were(6.00±2.00)hours and(9.10±0.80)scores,respectively,which were higher than those of the control group(2.00±1.00)hours and(7.30±1.10)scores,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The implementation of improved healing path intervention method can significantly improve the rehabilitation effect of nuclear recuperators,thereby improving the overall level of rehabilitation services and

关 键 词：涉核人员疗养 疗养路径 效果评估 

分 类 号：R82[医药卫生—临床医学]