制度逻辑视角下的《中长期科技规划》实施机制探究  

An analysis of the implementation mechanism of the Middle-and Long-Term Plan for Science and Technology from the perspective of institutional logics

作　　者：杨培培 柳卸林 Yang Peipei;Liu Xielin(Sino-Danish College,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research,Beijing 100190,China;School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China)

机构地区：[1]中国科学院大学中丹学院,北京100190 [2]中国—丹麦科研教育中心,北京100190 [3]中国科学院大学经济与管理学院,北京100190

出　　处：《科研管理》2023年第8期119-128,共10页Science Research Management

基　　金：国家自然科学基金重点项目:“高新技术产业突破性创新的形成机制与模式研究”(71932009,2020.01—2024.12);广东省软科学项目:“全省区域创新能力建设相关研究”(2021A1010010003,2021.10—2023.09)。

摘　　要：在我国成为创新型国家的道路上,《国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006-2020年)》起到了关键作用,提出的“自主创新”战略使国家创新体系发生了重要变化。本研究从制度逻辑视角出发归纳了政策中的三种主要制度逻辑,分别为科学逻辑、市场逻辑及政府逻辑,并探讨了多重逻辑在主要的创新主体,即大学和科研机构、私营企业和外资企业以及国有企业中产生的冲突。通过分析多重逻辑之间的兼容性以及实现次要逻辑所需支付的成本大小,将冲突分为了无冲突、微小冲突、中等冲突和较大冲突,并由此深入探究了创新主体在执行政策过程中产生绩效不足的原因。结果表明创新主体在各自的主导逻辑下均取得了一定成果,我国整体自主创新能力得到了显著提升;但在受到多重制度逻辑产生冲突的影响时,创新主体在部分领域效能低下。最后,针对我国现有的成效和不足,提出了减少逻辑冲突的路径,国家创新体系建设以及政策制定的启示。In the process of China′s striving for an innovative country,the National Middle-and Long-Term Plan for Science and Technology Development(2006-2020)plays a vital role,and in the plan"indigenous innovation"was proposed,which triggers a significant change in the national innovation system.Three types of institutional logics are concluded from the perspective of institutional logics,namely,academia logic,market logic and state logic.Conflicts aroused by the multiple logics within the main innovative actors in the national innovation system(including the universities and government research institutes,state-owned enterprises,private enterprises and foreign enterprises)are explored.By combining the logic compatibility and cost paying for achieving non-dominant logics′requirements,the conflicts are divided into four types,namely no conflict,minimal conflict,moderate conflict,and extensive conflict.The causes leading to actors′inefficient performance are analyzed subsequently.The findings show that under the guidance of the dominant logics,the innovative actors have achieved great success and the indigenous innovation capability of China is also improved significantly.However,the innovative outcomes in some areas still need to be improved when innovative actors facing logic conflicts.Under the academia logic,the universities and research institutes have promoted the development of basic science,which laid foundation of the improvement in China′s indigenous innovation capability.With the low compatibility between academia logic and market logic,as well as the low cost to meet the requirements of market logic,the conflict of the two logics within the universities and research institutes is moderate.The low compatibility between academia logic and state logic,and the low cost to meet the requirements of state logic also trigger moderate conflict in the universities and research institutes.As a result,the market transformation and application of their innovative outcomes still need to be improved.The private and fo

关 键 词：自主创新 创新主体 制度逻辑 逻辑冲突 实施机制 

分 类 号：F204[经济管理—国民经济]