论国际法的正当性  

The Legitimacy of International Law

作　　者：保罗·B.斯蒂芬 彭卓群(译) 韩秀丽(译)[2] B.Stephan;Peng Zhuoqun;Han Xiuli

机构地区：[1]美国弗吉尼亚大学法学院 [2]厦门大学法学院

出　　处：《国际经济法学刊》2023年第3期48-60,共13页Journal of International Economic Law

基　　金：司法部重点课题项目“习近平法治思想指导下涉外法治体系完善的结构化分析”(项目编号:21SFB1006)的阶段成果。

摘　　要：本文采取独特视角评价国际法的正当性,包括国际法是否是一个法律体系、评价国际法正当性的价值和标准的来源以及当代国际法实践是推动抑或阻碍了正当法律体系的发展。具言之,本文首先剖析了近代以来“国际法”这一概念经历的身份危机与逐步发展,并提出了“国际法”概念的功能性定义,断定在作为一种社会实践、存在承认规则的背景下,国际法能够成为一种法律体系。其次,以弗兰克的国际法正当性理论为出发点,本文讨论了正当性的来源与标准,并提出了关于国际法正当性的四项命题。最后,通过分析当代实践中大国行为违反国际法核心规范的国际事件,本文还指出国际法正当性虽可能受到严重挑战,但评价国际法正当性的合理依据是实际存在的。This paper takes a unique perspective to assess the legitimacy of international law,including whether international law is a legal system,what are the sources of values and criteria for assessing legitimacy,and whether the practice of contemporary international law promotes or hinders the development of a legitimate legal system.Specifically speaking,this paper analyzes the identity crisis and gradual development of the concept of"international law"since modern times,and puts forward a functional definition of"international law",which determines that international law qualifies as a legal system on the basis of social practice and the existence of rule of recognition.Starting from Franck's theory of legitimacy of international law,this paper discusses the origin and standard of legitimacy,and puts forward four propositions of legitimacy of international law.Finally,though the legitimacy of international law may be seriously challenged,the plausible arguments for assessing the legitimacy of international law do exist after the definitions and criteria are determined.

关 键 词：国际法 正当性 法律体系 社会实践 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]