检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾天杰 Gu Tianjie
机构地区:[1]浙江大学光华法学院
出 处:《国际经济法学刊》2023年第3期143-156,共14页Journal of International Economic Law
摘 要:由于投资协定中公平公正待遇条款的抽象性等特征,投资仲裁庭如何解释该条款成为国际投资法领域长期存在的难题。历史上,投资仲裁庭对于公平公正待遇条款任意的、不一致的解释和应用,导致该条款未能有效发挥对国内法的监督改善作用,反而阻碍了东道国规制权的合理行使,同时也对国际投资领域的良法善治造成了破坏。但东道国并非完全是公平公正待遇条款的被动接受者,由于国际投资法的社会嵌入性特征,在公平公正待遇条款的订立与实践过程中也可以观测到东道国国内法的反向输出。本文致力于从仲裁庭对公平公正待遇的合法解释、国内法在国际投资仲裁中应当享有的地位以及东道国如何合法行使规制权等三个维度,重新思考绝对待遇标准下国内法的定位,探索公平公正条款与东道国规制权的合理关系,从而促进公平公正待遇条款真正发挥维护投资法治的作用。nature of the fair and equitable treatment clause in investment agreements,how to interpret the clause by investment arbitral tribunals has become a long-standing problem.Historically,investment arbitral tribunals have interpreted and applied fair and equitable treatment arbitrarily and inconsistently,resulting in the failure of fair and equitable treatment to effectively supervise and improve domestic laws,and instead hinder the reasonable exercise of the host states'regulatory power.Good laws and good governance in the area of international investment have thus been wreaked havoc.However,the host state is not completely a passive recipient of the fair and equitable treatment clause.Due to the social embeddedness of international investment law,in the process of formulating and practicing the fair and equitable treatment clause,it can also be observed that the domestic law of the host state impacts the fair and just treatment clause.This paper is dedicated to rethinking the position of domestic law under the standard of absolute treatment from three dimensions:the legal interpretation of fair and equitable treatment by the arbitral tribunal,the status that domestic law should enjoy in international investment arbitration,and how the host state legally exercises its regulatory power.This paper explores the reasonable relationship between fair and equitable treatment clauses and the regulatory power of the host state,and seeks path that the promotion of fair and equitable treatment clauses can really play a role in maintaining the rule of law in investment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.232.123