示警性预防护理对重症肺炎患者风险系数及临床结局的影响  

Effect of warning preventive nursing on risk coefficient and clinical outcomes in patients with severe pneumonia

作　　者：潘海萍[1] 何平[1] Pan Haiping;He Ping(Department of Intensive Care Medicine,Wuxi Second People's Hospital,Wuxi 214000,China)

机构地区：[1]无锡市第二人民医院重症医学科,无锡214000

出　　处：《国际医药卫生导报》2023年第17期2494-2498,共5页International Medicine and Health Guidance News

基　　金：江苏省重点研发计划(BE2020616)。

摘　　要：目的探究示警性预防护理在重症肺炎患者中的临床效果。方法本文为前瞻性研究。选取2021年4月至2022年7月无锡市第二人民医院重症医学科收治的60例重症肺炎患者作为研究对象,根据随机数字表法将其分为两组,各30例。参照组男16例、女14例,年龄(66.42±3.51)岁,实施常规护理措施;干预组男18例、女12例,年龄(66.33±3.42)岁,实施示警性预防护理措施。对比两组入院1 d、出院前1 d风险系数、呼吸肺功能及并发症等发生情况。采用t检验、χ^(2)检验。结果出院前1 d,干预组英国胸科协会改良肺炎评分(CURB-65)[(2.03±0.12)分]、肺炎严重指数(PSI)[(84.43±5.33)分]均低于参照组[(2.19±0.21)分、(88.21±5.32)分],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。出院前1 d,干预组1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)[(84.24±1.42)%]、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)[(86.21±1.33)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)]、最大通气量(MVV)[(85.35±1.42)%]、用力肺活量(FVC)[(85.23±1.42)%]均高于参照组[(83.49±1.33)%、(85.32±1.42)mmHg、(84.33±1.44)%、(84.41±1.41)%],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。干预组并发症发生率为3.33%(1/30),低于参照组23.33%(7/30),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.192,P=0.023)。结论对收治的重症肺炎患者实施示警性预防护理措施,有助于降低患者风险系数水平,改善呼吸肺功能状态,减少并发症发生率。Objective To explore the clinical effect of warning preventive nursing in patients with severe pneumonia.Methods It was a prospective study.Sixty patients with severe pneumonia admitted to Department of Intensive Care Medicine,Wuxi Second People's Hospital from April 2021 to July 2022 were selected as the research objects,and were divided into a control group and an intervention group according to the random number table method with 30 cases in each group.In the control group,16 males and 14 females,aged(66.42±3.51)years,were given routine nursing measures;in the intervention group,18 males and 12 females,aged(66.33±3.42)years,were given warning preventive nursing measures.The risk coefficients and respiratory function 1 day after admission and 1 day before discharge and complications were compared between the two groups.t test andχ^(2)test were used.Results One day before discharge,the CURB-65(confusion,uremia,respiratory,BP,age 65 years)score[(2.03±0.12)points]and pneumonia severity index(PSI)[(84.43±5.33)points]in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group[(2.19±0.21)points and(88.21±5.32)points],with statistically significant differences(both P<0.05).One day before discharge,the forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1)[(84.24±1.42)%],partial oxygen pressure(PaO2)[(86.21±1.33)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)],maximum ventilatory volume(MVV)[(85.35±1.42)%],and forced vital capacity(FVC)[(85.23±1.42)%]in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group[(83.49±1.33)%,(85.32±1.42)mmHg,(84.33±1.44)%,and(84.41±1.41)%],with statistically significant differences(all P<0.05).The complication rate in the intervention group was 3.33%(1/30),which was lower than that in the reference group[23.33%(7/30)],with a statistically significant difference(χ^(2)=5.192,P=0.023).Conclusion The implementation of warning preventive nursing measures for severe pneumonia patients is helpful to reducing the level of risk coefficient,improve the status of respiratory lung function,and reduc

关 键 词：重症肺炎 示警性 预防护理 风险系数 呼吸肺功能 并发症 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]