检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛智胜[1] 张曦文 XUE Zhisheng;ZHANG Xiwen(Tiangong University,Tianjin 300380,China)
机构地区:[1]天津工业大学,天津300380
出 处:《中国证券期货》2023年第3期71-76,共6页Securities & Futures of China
摘 要:期货市场交易中,强行平仓制度是期货公司控制扩大期货交易风险与维护金融市场秩序所必要的手段。现行法律法规对于期货公司执行强行平仓时的数额限度并没有做出具体的规定,司法实践中仍然存在着期货公司超量平仓的情形。《期货和衍生品法》第一百三十五条规定,期货公司出现损害交易者利益的行为,应当承担赔偿责任。但是,对于期货公司由此所承担的民事责任性质还需做出进一步的区分,有利于进一步明确对于超量平仓民事责任的分担。In the futures market,the compulsory closing position system is a necessary means for futures companies to control and expand the futures trading risks and maintain the order of the financial market.The current laws and regulations have not made specific provisions on the amount limit when the futures company implements the compulsory liquidation,and there are still cases of excessive liquidation in the judicial practice.According to Article 135 of the futures and derivatives law,a futures company shall be liable for compensation for any act that damages the interests of traders.The nature of the civil liability borne by the futures company needs to be further distinguished,which is conducive to further clarifying the sharing of civil liability for excess liquidation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90