机构地区:[1]华南农业大学,广东广州510642 [2]福建农林大学,福建福州350002 [3]广州市林业和园林科学研究院广州市生态园林科技协同创新中心,广东广州510405 [4]湛江市林业良种繁育场,广东湛江524000
出 处:《中南林业科技大学学报》2023年第7期65-73,共9页Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology
基 金:国家重点研发计划项目“桉树高效培育技术研究”(2016YFD0600505);林业草原知识产权转化运用项目“华桉3号新品种转化运用”(KJZXZH202103)。
摘 要:【目的】对桉树人工林进行林分质量评价、质量等级划分以及阈值界定,构建质量评价指标体系,以期为精准提升桉树人工林质量,改造低质低效林林分提供科学依据。【方法】基于2018年的国家森林资源二类调查数据,采用因子分析和专家咨询相结合的方法对湛江33360个小班的桉树用材林进行评价指标选取、数据量化和标准化、评价指标体系构建、小班林分质量指数计算、林分质量评价与等级划分、林分特征指标界定研究。【结果】(1)15个桉树人工林林分质量评价指标存在相关性,适合进行因子分析;15个评价指标反映了桉树用材林林分质量在林分生长、林分立地、林分结构和森林健康4个方面的信息,因子分析效果较为理想。(2)桉树用材林林分质量评价指标重要性由大到小为公顷蓄积(活立木)、公顷生物量、平均高、平均胸径、森林健康度、植被总覆盖度、沙化程度、土壤侵蚀等级、枯枝落叶厚度、郁闭度、土壤类型、土层厚度、灾害等级、坡向、坡位。(3)幼龄林林分质量各等级数量所占比例为:中>良>劣>优>差,中龄林和近熟林的林分质量各等级数量所占比例为:中>劣>良>差>优,成熟林和过熟林的林分质量各等级数量所占比例为:劣>中>差>良>优。湛江桉树用材林的林分质量大部分为中等质量林和劣等质量林,龄组越高,低效林比重越大。(4)不同质量的公顷蓄积(活立木)、公顷生物量、平均高、平均胸径在不同龄组桉树用材林中差异显著;差等林中森林健康度和沙化程度有明显差异,枯枝落叶厚度仅中等质量以上的林分存在不同龄组间的差异;其他指标在不同龄组间差别不明显。【结论】(1)本研究构建的桉树人工林林分质量评价体系综合考虑了反映森林质量的各个方面的因素,可应用于湛江桉树用材林林分质量评价。(2)不同龄组桉树用材林质量等级划�【Objective】This research conducted the stand quality evaluation,quality grade division and threshold value definition of Eucalyptus plantation,and constructed an evaluation indicator system,to provide a scientific basis for accurately improving the stand quality of Eucalyptus plantation and reforming low quality and low-efficiency plantation.【Method】Based on the second-class national Forest Resources Survey data in 2018,the method of factor analysis and expert consultation was used to select evaluation indicators,quantify and standardize data,construct an evaluation indicator system,calculate stand quality indexes,evaluate stand quality,perform grade division,and define stand characteristic indicators for 33360 sub-compartment of the commercial plantation of Eucalyptus in Zhanjiang,Guangdong,China.【Result】(1)There were correlations among the 15 stand quality evaluation indicators of Eucalyptus plantation,which were suitable for factor analysis.The 15 evaluation indicators reflected the information on stand quality in 4 aspects of stand growth,stand site,stand structure and forest health,and the effect of factor analysis was satisfactory.(2)The importance of the stand quality evaluation indicators was in the order of volume per hectare(living timber),biomass per hectare,average height,mean diameter at breast height,forest health degree,total vegetation coverage,desertification degree,soil erosion grade,the thickness of litter,canopy density,soil type,soil thickness,disaster grade,aspect and slope position.(3)The proportion of each stand quality grade in the young forest was Medium>Good>Poor>Excellent>Bad,the proportion of the stand quality grade of half-mature forest and near-mature forest was Medium>Poor>Good>Bad>Excellent,and the proportion of the stand quality grade of mature forest and overmature forest was Poor>Medium>Bad>Good>Excellent.Most of the stand quality of the Eucalyptus plantation in Zhanjiang was medium quality and poor quality,and the older forest age group,the higher the proportion of
分 类 号:S792.39[农业科学—林木遗传育种]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...