对立、批判与融合视角下的中国大遗址保护与在地社区发展研究  

China's Large-Scale Archaeological Sites Protection and Local Community Development in the Perspectives of Opposition,Critique,and Integration

作　　者：王冬冬 WANG Dong-dong(Institute for Cultural Heritage and History of Science&Technology,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing,100083)

机构地区：[1]北京科技大学科技史与文化遗产研究院,北京100083

出　　处：《东南文化》2023年第4期14-21,共8页Southeast Culture

基　　金：2019年北京市社会科学基金资助项目“北京琉璃河遗址保护与活化利用研究”(19LSC009)。

摘　　要：中国大遗址保护与在地社区发展的协调问题一直是文化遗产管理领域的重要议题,以往的研究视角大致可分为二元对立视角、批判性视角和融合视角三类。三类视角在发现问题、分析问题和解决问题中的成效不尽一致:二元对立视角易于发现深层次矛盾,但实操性存在一定阻碍;批判性视角重在探讨内在逻辑,但理论意义大于实践意义;融合视角旨在提供普适性经验,但需要统筹考虑多重因素,获取成功经验较为困难。因此,具体案例和具体问题的分析需要高度重视不同视角的优势。多视角交叉分析有利于推进从理论到实践的中国大遗址保护与在地社区发展的协同研究。The coordination between the protection of China's large-scale heritage sites and the development of local communities has been an important issue in the field of cultural heritage management.Previous research perspectives can generally be categorized into three types:the binary opposition perspective,the critical perspective,and the integration perspective.The effectiveness of these three perspectives in identifying,analyzing,and solving problems varies.The binary opposition perspective is adept at identifying deep contradictions,but may face certain practical obstacles;The critical perspective focuses on exploring internal logic but holds greater theoretical than practical significance;The integration perspective aims to provide universal experiences but requires comprehensive consideration of multiple factors,making it challenging to obtain successful experiences.Therefore,the analysis of specific cases and issues requires a high attention to the strengths of different perspectives.Cross-analysis from multiple perspectives is beneficial in advancing the collaborative research on China's large-scale heritage sites protection and local community development,bridging the gap between theory and practice.

关 键 词：考古遗产 考古遗址 大遗址保护与管理 二元对立视角 批判性视角 融合视角 社区参与 可持续发展 

分 类 号：G112[文化科学]