检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:官家辉 何淼 Guan jiahui;He miao
机构地区:[1]杭州互联网法院
出 处:《数字法治》2023年第4期164-173,共10页DIGITAL LAW
摘 要:杭州互联网法院融合行政审判、网络安全和互联网技术的特点,立足网络治理的社会维度,探索与新兴数字产业模式创新发展速度相调适的司法裁判规则和治理模式,解决互联网新类型行政争议,督促行政机关强化互联网行政管理的法定职责,建设司法、行政、网络平台对网络空间进行数字化协同治理的新秩序。本文介绍了杭州互联网法院开展互联网行政争议调解中心建设、诉源治理建设和职业举报人诉权甄别机制建设的具体举措,对互联网行政管理机关在行政诉讼中的败诉成因深入展开分析,并提出互联网行政管理自动化等建设数字化法治政府的合理化建议。Hangzhou Internet Court combines the administrative trial,cyber security and internet technology together,and explores the judicial rules and governance model that adapt to the developmental speed of the emerging digital industry based on the social dimension of cyberspace governance.It settles new types of administrative disputes on the internet,supervises the administrative agency to perform statutory duties of internet administration,and constructs a new order of digital governance on cyberspace by judiciary,administrative agency and the network platforms.This article introduces specific measures taken by Hangzhou Internet Court to build the Internet Administrative Dispute Mediation Center,to manage the source of litigation and to construct a screening mechanism on the right of action of professional whistle-blowers.It also makes an indepth analysis of the reasons why administrative organs lose cases before proposing such measures on constructing a digital law-based government as automation of Internet administration,etc.
关 键 词:数字化协同治理 互联网行政审判 互联网行政争议调解中心 诉源治理 职业举报人诉权甄别机制 互联网行政管理自动化
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.64.87