论专利疑难案件中权利要求解释的本质——重构权利要求中的技术方案  

On the Essence of Claims Interpretation in Difficult Patent Cases——Reconstruction of Technical Solutions in Patent Claims

作　　者：何经纬[1] HE Jingwei(ZTE Corporation,Shenzhen 518057)

机构地区：[1]中兴通讯股份有限公司法律合规体系,深圳518057

出　　处：《专利代理》2023年第3期57-61,共5页Patent Agency

摘　　要：司法实践中,通常将被控侵权产品技术特征与专利技术特征完全相同称为字面侵权。约定俗成的称谓带来约定俗成的理解。专利与被控侵权产品的技术特征比对于是开始沦为文字游戏。一旦遇到疑难案件,这一极易固化的思维方式难免捉襟见肘。基于此,通过在一起疑难案件中适用定性的方法重构出权利要求书中两种不同的技术方案,并采用归谬法选取其中一种更为合理的技术方案作为权利要求解释的前提,以解决采用惯常的权利要求解释方法解释权利要求所带来的分歧和困境,进而阐明此类案件中权利要求解释的本质。In judicial practice,usually the technical features of the accused infringing product being exactly the same as the technical features of the patent is termed as literal infringement.Conventional terms bring conventional understandings.Comparisons of technical features between patents and alleged infringing products begin to be reduced to word games.Once a difficult case is encountered,this stereotypical way of thinking is difficult to avoid being overstretched.Based on this,this article uses qualitative methods to reconstruct two dif ferent technical solutions of one claim and adopts reduction to absurdity method to select a more reasonable technical solution as a premise for the interpretation of the claims in an exemplary case,so as to solve the conflicts and dilemmas brought by the use of conventional claim interpretation methods and illustrate the essence of claim interpretation in such difficult cases.

关 键 词：专利 权利要求解释 技术方案重构 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]