《曹沫之阵》与传世军事文献合证两则  

Two Marks of Comprehensive Interpretation among Caomo Zhi Zhen and Other Received Military Texts

作　　者：沈奇石 Shen Qishi(Center for the Study and Application of Chinese Characters,Fast China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中国文字研究与应用中心,上海200241

出　　处：《中国文字研究》2023年第1期53-58,共6页The Study of Chinese Characters

基　　金：2020年度教育部、国家语委甲骨文等古文字研究与应用专项重点项目“战国秦汉简帛文献通假字集成及资料库建设”(项目号:YWZ J030);2021年度教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目“出土商周秦汉文献通假语料的整理与资料库建设研究”(项目号:21JZD043)。

摘　　要：《曹沫之阵》中的两处字词释读,经合勘两种出土文献传本,与传世军事文献合证,得以解决。一是上博简本“■”是“■”的讹形。安大简本作“■”。所在简文可与《司马法·定爵》相关文句合证。旧读“敦”虽然合理,但要理解为“信”。二是上博简本“■”是一种带有“人”形饰笔的“鱼”字讹形,与“备”形近。安大简本作“■”。所在简文可与《左传》成公十六年相关文句合证。当读为“虏”。又据“鱼”“备”形体易混,可揭《玺汇》2562号印文当为“鱼(䰻/渔)玺”。Two words in Caomo Zhi Zhen are interpreted according to the comparation between two excavated versions.as well as other received military texts related.One is the“■”in the version of the Shanghai Museum Bamboo Slips,which was a typographical error of“■”。Its variation in the Anhui University Bamboo Slips is written as“■”。It should be read as“■”referring to“to be sincere”,compared by related texts in the Dingjue of Sima Law.The other is the“■”in the version of the Shanghai Museum Bamboo Slips,which was an typographical error of a special writing form of“鱼”,similar with“备”。Its variation in the Anhui University Bamboo Slips is writtenas“■”It should be read as“虏”,compared by related texts in the 16th year of Chenggong of Zhuozhuan.What's more,The text of Xihui No.2562 should be“鱼(■/渔)玺”according to the phenomenon of typographical error between“鱼”and“备”.

关 键 词：曹沫之阵 文献合证 敦 鱼 

分 类 号：H131[语言文字—汉语] K877[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学] G256[历史地理—历史学]