检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪鉴康 WANG Jiankang(Center for Studies of Intellectual Property Rights,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,武汉430073
出 处:《中国发明与专利》2023年第9期56-62,共7页China Invention & Patent
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“总体国家安全观下产业知识产权风险治理现代化研究”(编号:21&ZD203)资助。
摘 要:已有立法草案中的数据竞争法保护模式,主要从商业数据客体范围、数据不正当竞争行为以及除外情形三方面作出规定。从立法协调、司法效率、利益平衡等多元要求审视当前的数据专条,可以发现存在客体要件不完整、损害结果认定标准阻碍创新、除外情形限制缺乏效力等问题。为克服以上弊端,应在客体定义中加入公开性、集合性要件,并将技术管理性修改为管理性;应在行为规范中确立数据使用行为不正当规制的独立地位,并以“实质性相似”为损害结果标准;应将数据访问权引入除外情形,对数据权益进行有效限制。The competition law protection modes of data are mainly regulated in three aspects:the scope of commercial data objects,data unfair competition behaviors and excluded circumstances.When the current data provisions are examined by the principles of legislative harmonization,judicial efficiency and balance of interests,it can be found that there are problems such as incomplete object elements,the criteria for damage results hinder innovation,and insufficient restrictions on exclusions.In order to overcome the above shortcomings,we should add the elements of openness and aggregation to the definition of object,and modify technical management to management;we should establish the independent status of improper regulation of data use in the code of conduct,and use“substantially the same”as the standard of damage result;we should introduce the exclusion of data access right to effectively limit the data rights and interests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117