检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何志鹏[1,2] 王韵涵 HE Zhi-peng;WANG Yun-han(Research Center of Jurisprudence,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China;School of Law,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)
机构地区:[1]吉林大学理论法学研究中心,长春130012 [2]吉林大学法学院,长春130012
出 处:《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第5期49-56,共8页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大专项项目“坚持统筹推进国内法治与涉外法治研究”(2022JZDZ005)。
摘 要:国际法学界有关网络攻击中“武力”问题始终存在争议,包括工具说、目标说、效果说三种国际法学说,且网络攻击达到《联合国宪章》第2条第4款、第51条的门槛都尚无明确答案。而在界定过程中更会发现技术与法律层面具有“武力”难以溯源追责、检验难以全面评估的现存困境,因此有必要着重审思网络攻击中的武力使用,以便于提前寻求中国的解决方案。中国应在秉持《联合国宪章》精神基础上探索合作共赢方式,同步推进国际规则构建与中国立场表达,同时规范网络攻击立法并加强网络安全技术保护,促进网络空间国际法治成熟与发展。The issue of“force”in cyber attacks has always been controversial in international legal circles,including three theories of international law,namely the tool theory,the target theory,and the effect theory.And there is no clear answer as to whether cyber attacks meet the thresholds of Article 2,paragraph 4,and Article 51 of the UN Charter.In the process of defining a cyber attack as“use of force”or“armed attack”,at the technical and legal level,it will be found that there is an existing dilemma that“force”is difficult to trace to the source,and it is difficult to comprehensively assess the test.Therefore,it is necessary to focus on the issue of“force”in cyber attacks,so as to seek Chinese solutions in advance.China should analyze the use of force in cyber attacks on the basis of existing international law,be alert to the conceptual export of the United States and the West,and focus on launching China''''s plans.At the same time,uphold the spirit of the United Nations Charter,strengthen international cyber security cooperation,and promote the maturity and development of the international rule of law in cyberspace.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.98.87