著作权民刑保护之间的法域冲突及其化解  

Jurisdictional Conflict Between Civil and Criminal Protection of Copyright and Its Resolution

作　　者：刘铁光 Liu Tieguang

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2023年第5期176-188,共13页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目一般项目(21BFX197)“知识产权民刑保护之法域冲突及其化解研究”。

摘　　要：著作权民刑保护的对象是著作权的法定专有权及其法益。《著作权法》与《刑法》对专有出版权的保护以及对“冒名”的规制是在法定专有权之外提供保护;《刑法》在“复制发行”“作品类型”“规避技术措施”等三个方面脱离《著作权法》规定侵犯著作权罪;对《刑法》上“复制发行”的解释背离《著作权法》对相关概念的界定。应通过《刑法》对侵犯著作权罪采空白罪状的立法模式以及删除《著作权法》有关保护专有出版权与“冒名”的规定两个方面化解著作权民刑保护之间的法域冲突。The objects protected by copyright civil law and criminal law are the statutory exclusive rights and legal interests of copyright.The protection of exclusive publishing rights and regulation of“false names”by the Copyright Law and the Criminal Law exist beyond statutory exclusive rights;the Criminal Law defines infringement of copyright crimes in three aspects independent of the Copyright Law,namely“reproduction and distribution”,“types of works”,and“circumvention measures”;the interpretation of“reproduction and distribution”by the Criminal Law deviates from the definition of relevant concepts by the Copyright Law.To resolve the conflict between civil and criminal copyright protection,it is necessary to adopt a legislative model of blank charges for copyright infringement crimes under the Criminal Law and delete two aspects related to the protection of exclusive publishing rights and“false names”in the Copyright Law.

关 键 词：权利法定原则 专有权控制行为 违法性判断 罪刑法定原则 空白罪状 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]