发展型乡村治理模式:基于要素—资产转换的再解读  

Developmental Rural Governance Model: a ReinterpretationBased on Element-Asset Transformation

作　　者：赵德余[1] ZHAO Deyu(School of Social Development and Public Policy,Fudan University,Shanghai,China,200433)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院,上海200433

出　　处：《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第5期35-45,共11页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目“新时代乡村振兴战略与‘三农’问题研究”(20JZD031)。

摘　　要：影响乡村治理的诸多资源要素需要甄别和归纳,如信息、关系、政治要素、组织资源、人情爱心、专业知识、学习能力、环境以及信任等,这些要素产生的收益绝大部分是无形的或非货币化的收益,包括矛盾化解、公共服务、资产建设以及环境保护等,这种无形的收益或价值也是某种“金山银山”。通过在有形、无形的要素和无形的收益之间构建起一种价值生产或创造的资源—资产转换机制,而该链接生产机制通常会伴随着乡村基层社会自治组织的形态或治理结构的变化,或者说在某种程度上这意味着基层组织制度的创新。从“两山”理念的视角来看,乡村治理经验和乡村(产业)发展是相互补充,起到相互融合作用的,即在治理中促进乡村发展,而在发展中来提升乡村社会的治理水平。Many resource elements affecting rural governance need to be screened and summarized,such as information,relationship,political elements,organizational resources,favors and love,professional knowledge,learning ability,environment,and trust,etc.,and the vast majority of the benefits generated by these elements are intangible or non-monetizable benefits including conflict resolution,public services,asset building,and environmental protection,etc.,and such intangible benefits or values are also some kind of“invaluable assets”.By constructing a resource-asset conversion mechanism for value production or creation between tangible and intangible elements and intangible benefits,the link production mechanism is usually accompanied by a change in the shape or governance structure of rural grassroots social self-governance organizations,which to a certain extent implies an innovation in the grassroots organization system.From the perspective of the Two Mountains Theory,the experience of rural governance and rural(industrial)development are complementary to and integrated into each other,that is to say,to promote rural development in governance,and to improve the governance level of rural society in development.

关 键 词：乡村治理 两山理念 无形资产 发展型治理 

分 类 号：C939[经济管理—管理学]