检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于杨 王娜[1] 任阳[1] 徐萍[1] 李绍静[1] 张杰[1] 曾立鑫 马程明[1] YU Yang;WANG Na;REN Yang;XU Ping;LI Shaojing;ZHANG Jie;ZENG Lixin;MA Chengming(Langfang Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Langfang,Hebei 065000,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]廊坊市疾病预防控制中心,河北廊坊065000 [2]海南科技职业大学
出 处:《医学动物防制》2023年第8期814-816,F0003,共4页Journal of Medical Pest Control
基 金:国家卫健委职业病危害现状调查项目(国统制[2020]8号)。
摘 要:目的为掌握廊坊市职业病危害的基本情况,为职业病防治工作提供数据支撑。方法于2020年采用“职业病危害现状调查表”,对廊坊市1932家企业职业危害因素和职业卫生管理现状开展现况调查,并对调查结果进行统计分析。结果廊坊市调查的企业中,职业病危害因素劳动者接害率随企业规模由大到小呈上升趋势,微型企业接害率最高,为46.94%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=10024.64,P<0.05);大型企业的培训率和职业病危害项目申报率最高,均为100.00%。微型企业主要负责人和职业健康管理人员培训率和申报率最低,分别为22.60%、21.42%和9.90%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);大型企业职业病危害因素检测率最高,为80.00%,微型企业职业病危害因素检测率最低,为10.98%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论廊坊市不同企业规模,劳动者接害率、职业健康培训率和职业病危害因素检测率存在差异,应以小微企业为重点,加强职业卫生执法和宣传,并采取相应措施加强廊坊市企业职业卫生管理水平。Objective To grasp the basic situation of occupational disease hazards in Langfang City and provide data support for the prevention and treatment of occupational diseases.Methods In 2020,a survey on the current situation of occupational hazards and occupational health management of 1932 enterprises in Langfang City was conducted using the"Occupational Disease Hazard Status Questionnaire",and the results were statistically analyzed.Results Among the enterprises surveyed in Langfang,the rate of occupational disease hazards received by workers increased with the size of enterprises from large to small,and the highest rate of micro enterprises was 46.94%,the differences were statistically significant(χ^(2)=10024.64,P<0.05);the training rate in large enterprises and the declaration rate of occupational disease hazard projects were the highest,both being 100%.The training rates of the main person in charge and occupational health management personnel and declaration rate in micro enterprises were the lowest,22.60%,21.42%and 9.90%respectively,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);the detection rate of occupational disease hazard factors in large enterprises was the highest,80.00%,and the detection rate of occupational disease hazard factors in micro enterprises was the lowest,10.98%.The chi-square test suggested that the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion There are differences in the rates of workers'exposure to hazards,occupational health training and detection of occupational disease hazard factors in Langfang City with different enterprise sizes,and the focus should be on small and micro enterprises to improve occupational health law enforcement and publicity,and take corresponding measures to strengthen the level of occupational health management of enterprises in Langfang City.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.104.28