检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王勇[1] 王功臣 韩冠旭 张宝明 钟波 陈振兴 WANG Yong;WANG Gongchen;HAN Guanxu;ZHANG Baoming;ZHONG Bo;CHEN Zhenxing(State Key Lab.of Intelligent Construction and Health Operation&Maintenance of Deep Underground Eng.,China Univ.of Mining&Technol.,Xuzhou 221008,China;Shandong Jianke Architectural Design Co.,Ltd.,Ji’nan 250001,China;Shandong Quality Inspection and Testing Center of Con�struction Eng.Co.,Ltd.,Ji’nan 250031,China;Sichuan Fire Research Inst.of Ministry of Emergency Management,Chengdu 610036,China)
机构地区:[1]中国矿业大学深地工程智能建造与健康运维全国重点实验室,江苏徐州221008 [2]山东建科建筑设计有限责任公司,山东济南250001 [3]山东省建筑工程质量检验检测中心有限公司,山东济南250031 [4]应急管理部四川消防研究所,四川成都610036
出 处:《工程科学与技术》2023年第5期61-74,共14页Advanced Engineering Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(51408594);江苏省研究生科创项目(KYCX22_2579);徐州自然科学基金项目(KC22347);山东省科技型中小企业创新能力提升工程项目(2022TSGC2170);四川省博士后科研项目(TB2022051)。
摘 要:为了研究混凝土楼盖火灾后承载性能和破坏模式,对3块灾后楼盖和2块常温楼盖开展力学性能试验,获得了混凝土楼盖裂缝、破坏模式、变形、混凝土和钢筋应变等发展规律。基于塑性铰线理论,考虑梁刚度和变形对楼盖极限承载力的影响,建立了灾后楼盖剩余承载力和破坏模式计算方法,并与试验结果进行对比。结果表明:不同承载机制致使灾后和常温楼盖破坏模式略有不同,灾后楼盖表现为板先破坏模式,常温楼盖表现为梁先破坏模式;受火楼盖中板格易发生灾后爆裂,致使其保护层脱落、有效厚度减少,以及钢筋与混凝土间黏结性能降低,进而倾向于发生弯曲破坏和冲切破坏;相比配筋方式,配筋率对楼盖极限承载力有更为重要的影响,随着板格配筋率提高,极限承载力增加,但发生脆性破坏的可能性增加,特别是采用双层双向配筋方式的板格;传统简支板和固支板屈服线理论,倾向于低估或高估楼盖承载力。本文方法考虑边梁刚度和竖向变形的影响,其所得楼盖极限承载力计算结果较为合理,可用于确定结构中楼盖火灾后破坏模式和制定合理的灾后加固及修复措施。To investigate the post-fire residual capacity and failure mode of the concrete beam-slab specimens,the mechanical tests of three fire-damaged specimens and two reference specimens were conducted.The cracks,failure modes,deflections,and concrete and steel strains were ob-served during each test.Based on the conventional yield line method,the stiffness and deflection of the beam were considered to establish the the-oretical method,and the residual ultimate load and failure modes of the specimens can be analyzed,and the predicted results were compared to the experimental results.Results showed that different mechanisms of the reference and fire-damaged specimens led to different failure modes,in-cluding the first-panel failure and the first beam failure.In addition,due to the post-fire spalling,the concrete cover of the fire-damaged panel fell off,and its effective thickness and bond strength degraded.Thus,apart from the flexural failure,the punching failure mode of the fire-damaged specimen also occurred.Compared to the reinforcement layout,the reinforcement ratio had a considerable effect on the ultimate loads of the beam-slab specimens,increasing the reinforcement ratio of the panel led to its higher carrying capacity and the brittle failure easily appeared.The con-ventional simply supported and fixed yield line method tended to underestimate or overestimate the ultimate loads of the specimens.For the present method,the effect of the edge beam’s stiffness and the vertical deflection was considered,and thus it could reasonably predict the ultimate loads,the failure mode and the reinforcement or repair method of the fire-damaged beam-slab specimens.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31