论NFT数字作品发行权的证成与扩张  

The Establishment and Expansion of the Distribution Right in NFT Digital Works

作　　者：刘维[1] 林星成 Liu Wei;Lin Xingcheng(Koguan School of Law,Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200030

出　　处：《新闻界》2023年第8期70-82,共13页Journalism and Mass Communication

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字网络空间的知识产权治理体系研究”(19ZDA164)。

摘　　要：NFT数字作品被提出至今尚未有明确定义。基于NFT铸造原理,NFT数字作品应当由NFT、智能合约地址、底层作品三部分构筑而成,并依凭底层作品而拥有著作权。NFT数字作品的网络虚拟财产定位与交易机制原理分别符合发行权实质标准的客体特征与行为方式,NFT数字作品交易应当定性为发行行为。NFT数字作品的无形性与权利用尽原则的设立目的相悖,排除权利用尽原则能形成新的利益平衡结构,权利用尽原则已无适用之必要。现有的版税收取功能是发行权扩张后的行权后果,而非追续权的表现。NFT digital works have not yet been clearly defined since they were proposed. Based on the principle of NFT casting, a NFT digital work should be constructed from three parts: NFT,smart contract address, and anunderlying work. And NFT digital works have copyright because of the existence of underlying works. The positioning of network virtual property and the principle of transaction mechanism of NFT digital works are in line with the object characteristics and behavioral mode of the substantive standard of the right of distribution respectively, and the transaction of NFT digital works should be qualified as the act of distribution. The intangible nature of NFT digital works contradicts with the purpose of the establishment of the exhaustion-of-rights doctrine, and the exclusion of the exhaustion-of-rights doctrine can form the structure of the new balance of interests, so that the exhaustion-of-rights doctrine has no longer been necessary to be applied. The existing royalty collection function is a consequence of the expansion of distribution right, rather than a manifestation of retroactive right.

关 键 词：NFT数字作品 发行权 权利用尽原则 追续权 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学]