检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:向野[1] Xiang Ye
机构地区:[1]四川省社会科学院历史研究所,四川成都610071
出 处:《中华文化论坛》2023年第4期145-159,191,共16页Journal of Chinese Culture
摘 要:自20世纪疑古运动兴起以来,围绕古蜀历史的研究,学者从不同角度对古史辨派带来的挑战进行了回应,其中有合理之处,也有不尽合理之处。本文就学者对“古史辨”的回应进行了梳理,取其有代表性的论述,从方法上加以探讨。最终,经由对学术史的回顾,提出古蜀历史的重建,离不开对材料的主观诠释;学者应继承“古史辨”的成果,充分利用新材料,从而继续推进古蜀历史的研究。Since the rise of the movement of questioning the ancient history in the last century,scholars have responded to the challenges brought by the school of debating ancient history from different perspectives in the study of the ancient Shu history,some of which are reasonable and some are not reasonable.This article sorts out the responses of scholars to the"ancient history debate",selects its representative discussion,and methodologically discusses it.Finally,through the review of the academic history,it is pointed out that the reconstruction of the ancient Shu history is inseparable from the subjective interpretation of the materials.Scholars should inherit the achievements of the school of"debating ancient history"and make full use of new materials,so as to promote the study of the ancient Shu history.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.254