互联网版权治理中的“自治”与“管制”协同  

"Private Autonomy"and"Administrative Intervention"in Internet Copyright Governance

作　　者：熊琦[1] 朱若含 XIONG Qi;ZHU Ruohan

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学法学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《学习与实践》2023年第9期66-74,共9页Study and Practice

基　　金：国家社科基金重大攻关项目“数字网络空间的知识产权治理体系研究”(项目编号:19ZDA164)。

摘　　要：在互联网产业主导版权产业的格局下,我国互联网版权治理逐渐形成“行政管制”主导“行业自治”的治理模式。在互联网业态日趋复杂的新阶段,该模式因过度介入行业自治范式,持续引发争议。行政管制模式的治理边界,应局限于著作权法上公共利益范畴之内并克制其泛化解释的趋势,区分一般竞争行为与损害公共利益行为。同时,应限定行政介入的程度,理性区分“无需干预”的市场竞争与“需要治理”的市场乱象,尊重产业主体对许可模式的选择以及过滤机制适用的取舍,为其探索新型商业模式保留充分的自治空间。Under the pattern of Internet industry leading copyright industry,copyright implementation in China gradually formed a unique way characterized by"administrative intervention"working over"industry au⁃tonomy".With increasingly complex formats of Internet industry in new stage,this model starts to raise contro⁃versy due to its highly involvement in self-negotiation supposed to be closed by market players.Therefore,the boundary of administrative intervention should be strictly limited to the category of public interest in copyright law,and the tendency to generalize explanations should be restrained by distinguishing between general com⁃petitive behavior and the other ones that harmed public interest.Furthermore,administrators need to regulate how administrative intervention mode should work and rationally tell the difference between market competi⁃tion where there is"no need to intervene"and market chaos that is"still need to intervene".By leaving the choice of picking the proper licensing model and accepting the filtering mechanism or not to industry entities themselves,they could finally enjoy sufficient private ordering in copyright implementation and find their own way to explore new business models.

关 键 词：互联网产业 版权产业 版权治理 过滤义务 私人自治 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]