不同饲料添加剂对白羽番鸭生产效果的影响  

The effect of different feed additives on the production of white muscovy duck

作　　者：梁阿政 Liang A zheng(Zhangzhou Changlong Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Co.Ltd,Fujian Zhangzhou363118)

机构地区：[1]漳州昌龙农牧有限公司,福建漳州363118

出　　处：《福建畜牧兽医》2023年第5期3-5,共3页Fujian Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary medicine

摘　　要：为了探讨不同饲料添加剂对白羽番鸭生长性能的影响,以漳州昌龙农牧有限公司饲养的白羽番鸭为试验动物,试验期为70 d,将1 440羽1日龄白羽番鸭健雏随机均分为4个处理组,1~21日龄期间均饲喂小鸭料基础饲粮,在22日龄称重后,再将每组随机分为3个重复,每个重复100羽。试验I组为对照组,饲喂中大鸭料基础日粮,试验Ⅱ组饲喂中大鸭料基础日粮+3%牧翔大态能,试验Ⅲ组饲喂中大鸭料基础日粮+0.025%赛福多糖,试验Ⅳ组饲喂中大鸭料基础日粮+0.2%禽长灵,饲喂至70日龄。记录饲料用量,在63日龄和70日龄时称重,计算料肉比。结果表明:Ⅱ组体重最大,但各组间体重无显著性差异(P>0.05);各组间耗料比无显著性差异(P>0.05),其中Ⅱ组比Ⅰ组低0.005、Ⅲ组比Ⅰ组低0.029、Ⅳ组比Ⅰ组低0.058;各组间每千克增重耗料成本无显著性差异(P>0.05),但存在差异:Ⅱ组比Ⅰ组低0.008元、Ⅲ组比Ⅰ组低0.063元、Ⅳ组比Ⅰ组低0.141元。综合来看,试验Ⅳ组饲喂中大鸭料基础日粮+0.2%禽长灵的性价比最高。In order to explore the effects of different feed additives on the growth performance of white muscovy ducks,white muscovy ducks raised by Zhangzhou Changlong agriculture and animal husbandry co.ltd.were used as experimental animals.The experimental period was 70 days.14401-day-old healthy white muscovy ducks were randomly divided into 4 treatment groups,and the basic diet of ducklings was fed between 1 and 21 days old.After weighing at 22 days old,each group was randomly divided into 3 replicates,with 100 each replicate.Group I was fed a basal diet of medium to large ducks as the control group,while group II was fed a basal diet of medium to large ducks with 3%Muxiang macroenergy,group III was fed a basal diet of medium to large ducks with 0.025%Saifu polysaccharide,group IV was fed a basal diet of medium to large ducks with 0.2%Qinchangling until 70 days old,and the feed dosage was recorded.The feed to meat ratio was calculated at 63 and 70 days old.The results showed that group II had the highest body weight,but there was no significant difference between the groups(P>0.05);There was no significant difference in material consumption ratio between groups(P>0.05),with group II being 0.005 lower than group I,group III being 0.029 lower than group I,and group IV being 0.058 lower than group I;There was no significant difference in material consumption cost per kilogram of weight gain among groups(P>0.05),but there are differences:Group II is lower than group I by 0.008 yuan,group III is lower than group I by 0.063 yuan,and group IV is lower than group I by 0.141 yuan.Overall,the cost-effectiveness of feeding medium to large ducks with a basic diet of 0.2%Qinchangling in group IV of the experiment was the highest.

关 键 词：饲料添加剂 白羽番鸭 生长性能 

分 类 号：S834.5[农业科学—畜牧学]