检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨天宏[1] 何玉 Yang Tianhong;He Yu
出 处:《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2023年第5期106-123,195,196,共20页Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“中国国会会议史”(19ZDA210)。
摘 要:法权会议是美国主导的近代国际联合对华立法、司法调查。美国在法权会议期间的对华外交呈现出尊重中国“主权完整”与维持“必要之恶”并行的特点。在制定与践行该外交政策的过程中,美国法界认知与政府决策密切互动。20世纪20年代前期,对于在华治外法权问题,美国法界主流舆论与政府认知相互影响。在法权会议筹备阶段,美国政府迎合法界共识并任用以法界代表司注恩为核心的代表团筹划组织架构与会议流程。法权会议开幕后,按照凯洛格对司注恩的训令,美国对华外交在内部张力凸显后得以重新调适。在报告书起草阶段,美国政府继续宏观把控进程。为保障和协调列强在华利益,司注恩主导完成《调查法权委员会报告书》。最终维持“必要之恶”的现实需要压倒尊重“主权完整”的政策表达。The Commission on Extraterritoriality in China,1926,was a modern international legislative and judicial investigation led by the United States with respect to China.During the commission activities,U.S.diplomacy towards China demonstrated a dual aspect,respecting China s“sovereignty”while simultaneously maintaining the“necessary evil”.In the formulation and implementation of this diplomatic policy,there was a close interaction between the U.S.legal community and government decision-making.In the early 1920s,concerning the issue of extraterritoriality in China,the mainstream opinion within the U.S.legal community influenced government perceptions due to its unique social standing and the close connections between certain legal elites and government diplomatic decisions.Both sides recognized to varying degrees that addressing the issue of extraterritoriality in China required safeguarding U.S.interests in China within the framework of respecting China s“sovereign integrity”.During the preparatory stage of the activities of the Commission,the U.S.government partly accommodated the consensus within the legal community,made appropriate concessions to China under the spirit of Washington Conference Resolution,and balanced the principles of respecting China s“sovereign integrity”and maintaining U.S.interests in China.They also appointed a delegation,with the representative of the legal community,Silas H.Strawn,as the core to plan the organizational structure and work proceedings.The U.S.delegation vigorously sought unity among the major powers and appropriately addressed Chinese demands in minor details,continually shaping a friendly image toward China.However,after the opening session,Silas H.Strawn increasingly emphasized safeguarding U.S.interests in China,relatively neglecting the respect for China s“sovereign integrity”.Under the guidance of Kellogg s instructions to Silas H.Strawn,U.S.diplomacy toward China underwent a readjustment in response to internal tensions:formally respecting China s“
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.74.222