拱盖法暗挖地铁车站风道接主体进洞技术方案分析  

Technical Solution Analysis of Air Duct to Main Tunnel-Introduction Scheme at Arch-cover Method Excavated Metro Station

作　　者：马全武 雷刚 刘明明 董亚男 杨沚蕙 MA Quanwu;LEI Gang;LIU Mingming;DONG Ya’nan;YANG Zhihui(Qingdao Metro Group Co.,Ltd.,266011,Qingdao,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]青岛地铁集团有限公司,青岛266011 [2]北京城建设计发展集团股份有限公司,北京100037 [3]中国电建集团昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司,昆明650051

出　　处：《城市轨道交通研究》2023年第9期46-50,共5页Urban Mass Transit

基　　金：青岛地铁科技创新基金项目(M4-ZH-2020-134);广东省普通高校创新团队项目(2022KCXTD052);北京市科技服务品牌机构建设创新基金项目(20220467086)。

摘　　要：目的:在施工过程中,当风道等附属结构转入车站主体施工时,两者连接处的受力复杂,施工难度较大,因此需对地铁车站风道接主体进洞技术方案进行研究,选择一个合理的接口形式,以保证施工工程的质量与安全。方法:以青岛地铁某拱盖法施工车站工程为例,采用MIDAS GTS软件建立风道接口有限元模型;结合现场监测数据,对比分析风道挑高半断面进洞方案、风道挑高全断面进洞方案、风道压低半断面进洞方案和风道压低全断面进洞方案的地面位移与支护结构应力。结果及结论:风道压低与风道挑高方案相比,风道压低方案的最大竖向位移为8.40 mm,风道挑高方案的最大竖向位移为21.70 mm,其是风道压低方案的2.6倍;施工结束后,风道压低方案的最终竖向位移为1.34 mm,风道挑高方案的最终竖向位移为10.50 mm;风道压低方案中,全断面进洞方案的最终竖向位移为1.42 mm,半断面进洞方案的最终竖向位移为1.26 mm。综合考虑4种方案的支护结构应力分析结果,风道压低全断面接口方案的支护结构应力偏小且满足强度要求,因此风道压低全断面接口方案为最优方案。Objective:During construction,when auxiliary structures such as air ducts are transferred to the station main structure construction,the connection between them experiences complex forces and the construction faces significant challenges.Therefore,it is necessary to study the technical solutions of air duct to main tunnel-introduction scheme at metro station and an appropriate interface form is selected to ensure the quality and safety of the construction project.Method:Taking a station project of Qingdao Metro constructed by arch-cover method as an example,the finite element model of air duct interface is established using MIDAS GTS software.With reference to field-measured data,the ground displacement and support structure stress of the following schemes are comparatively analyzed:air duct elevated half-section entry scheme,air duct elevated full-section entry scheme,air duct depressed half-section entry scheme,and air duct depressed full-section entry scheme.Result&Conclusion:Among the two depressed schemes and the two elevated schemes,the maximum vertical displacement of the former is 8.40 mm,while the maximum vertical displacement of the latter is 21.70 mm,about 2.6 times higher.After the construction is completed,the final vertical displacements are 1.34 mm for the depressed schemes and 10.50 mm for the elevated schemes.In the former,the final vertical displacement is 1.42 mm for the full-section entry scheme and 1.26 mm for the half-section entry scheme.Considering the stress analysis results of support structures for four schemes,the depressed full-section entry scheme exhibits lower support structure stress while meeting the strength requirements,making it the optimal solution.

关 键 词：地铁 车站 拱盖法 风道 进洞方案 

分 类 号：U231.3[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]