检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于滨 Yu Bin(Wittenberg University)
机构地区:[1]美国文博大学 [2]教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地华东师范大学俄罗斯研究中心 [3]上海美国研究所
出 处:《俄罗斯研究》2023年第4期23-55,共33页Russian Studies
摘 要:自俄乌冲突爆发以来,西方对中俄关系的强烈质疑和诋毁,在相当程度上反映了西方认知层面的极度线性思维方式和强烈的意识形态取向。本文对中俄数百年交往史进行了梳理和研判,认为中俄之间的战略协作伙伴关系是一种摆脱了近代极不对称形态和冷战时期高度意识形态化的、高水平的、正常的互动机制。这一定位不仅是对西学中缺失中间层次的“有限论”和“威胁论”的必要矫正,也是对极化的“西方主义”的批判。中俄关系的深化与扩展对欧亚大陆的稳定和繁荣而言不可或缺,也为国与国、不同文明之间预防、掌控和处理危机提供了一个有益的参照。Since the Russia-Ukraine conflict started,the West has strongly questioned and criticized Sino-Russian relations.Such a propensity is rooted in the West's excessive linear thinking at the cognitive level and strong ideological connotation in the policy domain.A cursory look at the Sino-Russian interactions in modern history indicates that the current strategic partnership between China and Russia is a high-level,normal relationship contrasting to the extremely asymmetrical format in modern times and the excessive ideologization during the Cold War.Such a qualification is not only a necessary correction to the dichotomy between the prevailing"limit school"and"threat school"in the Western studies of Sino-Russian relations,but also a critique of the so-called"Westernism",or solipsism in the West's political theorization.The deepening and broadening of the normal Sino-Russian relations is indispensable to the stability and prosperity of the Eurasian continent.It also provides a valuable model for inter-state and inter-civilization relations for crisis prevention and management in the age of WMD.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.158.138