检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚小燕 Yao Xiaoyan
机构地区:[1]天津师范大学历史文化学院,天津师范大学古籍保护研究院,天津300387
出 处:《大学图书馆学报》2023年第5期75-82,共8页Journal of Academic Libraries
摘 要:目前国内外各古籍存藏机构使用的古籍分类法五花八门、复杂多样.本研究利用调研所得数据分析造成这一现状的成因,并通过综述20世纪以来的古籍分类研究进展,揭示了迄今尚未诞生一部统一的中国古籍分类法的原因,希冀有关专家能结合当下中小型图书馆古籍分类的现实需求和“即类求书,因书究学”的检索需求,合力编纂一部统一的具有时代意义、实践意义和指导意义的中国古籍分类法.At present,the classification of ancient books in ancient books collection institutions at home and abroad is diversified and complicated.This study analyzes the causes of the situation by using data obtained from investigation and reveals the reasons why a unified classification of Chinese ancient books has not yet presented by reviewing the research progress of ancient books classification since the 20th century.It is hoped that the practical needs of the small and medium-sized libraries in ancient book classification and the search needs of“seeking books by class,doing research with book”can be combined to compile a unified Chinese ancient book classification with timely,practical and guiding significance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.210.36