开展“活”的“藏书楼”研究--对藏书史和图书馆史中若干概念与方法的审思  

Moving Towards“Living”Library History Research——Thoughts on Several Concepts and Methods in Library History

作　　者：孙岩 Sun Yan

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学清史研究所,北京100872

出　　处：《大学图书馆学报》2023年第5期83-91,共9页Journal of Academic Libraries

基　　金：中国人民大学2023年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划、中国人民大学清史研究所重大基地项目“清代政教关系与地方治理研究”(编号:22JJD770062)的研究成果之一。

摘　　要：中国藏书史研究已有百年的积淀,既取得了大量成就,也存在诸多问题,亟需对一些概念和方法进行重审。文章首先揭示“藏书楼”与“图书馆”术语在近现代被双向建构的过程,理清了前者的指涉和层次。其次,反思藏书史、图书馆史既有研究的局限所在,提出应结合“公私”“政教”等传统政治史、文化史中的核心议题以及数字人文的方法,拓展研究视域和呈现方式。最终落脚于让书籍和藏书楼研究“鲜活”起来,借此认识中国文明传承的政治、文化底色及其价值和局限所在。The research on the history of book collections in China has accumulated for a hundred years,which has not only made a lot of achievements,but also had many problems,so as it is time to review some concepts and methods.This paper firstly reveals the bidirectional construction process of the terms of“Cangshu Lou”(the pavilion of collecting books in ancient China)and“library”in modern China,then clarified the meaning and hierarchy of former term.Secondly,it reflects on the limitations of the existing research on library history and book collection history.It is suggested that the core issues in traditional political history and cultural history such as“public and private”,“politics and education”,as well as the methods of digital humanities,should be combined to expand the research horizon and presentation methods.In the end,it aims to make the study of library history“alive”,so as to understand the political and cultural background of the inheritance of Chinese civilization,as well as its value or limitations.

关 键 词：藏书史 藏书楼 路径依赖 数字人文 现代化 

分 类 号：G250.9[文化科学—图书馆学]