检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程冲 商文莉 殷颂葵[1] 黄涛 Cheng Chong;Shang Wenli;Yin Songkui;Huang Tao(School of Finance and Economics,Qinghai University,Xining 810016,China;School of Economics and Finance,Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710061,China)
机构地区:[1]青海大学财经学院,西宁810016 [2]西安交通大学经济与金融学院,西安710061
出 处:《统计与决策》2023年第17期10-16,共7页Statistics & Decision
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目(19BJY056,20BGL204)。
摘 要:文章首先基于共同富裕的内涵,构建涵盖生产力、发展机会、收入分配、发展保障、人民福祉五个维度的共同富裕评价指标体系;然后采用熵值法对2001—2020年中国共同富裕水平进行动态评价,并在此基础上借助Dagum基尼系数和方差分解剖析共同富裕水平的空间差异来源和结构差异来源;最后,运用二次指派程序(QAP)实证考察其形成机理。研究发现:我国共同富裕水平虽然总体偏低,但呈现稳定上升的趋势,整体呈现“东部—中部—西部”阶梯式降低以及“北高、南低”的空间格局;共同富裕水平的差异呈现波动缩小趋势,东西向差异主要来源于区域间差异,南北向差异主要来源于区域内差异;生产力差异和人民福祉差异是我国共同富裕水平差异的主要结构来源;生产力、人民福祉、发展保障、发展机会、收入分配对共同富裕差异的扩大均存在正向影响但影响依次减弱。Based on the connotation of common affluence,this paper constructs a common affluence evaluation index system covering the five dimensions of productivity,development opportunities,income distribution,development security,and people’s well-being,and then uses the entropy method to make a dynamic evaluation of China's common affluence from 2001 to 2020,on this basis,analyzing the sources of spatial and structural differences of common affluence by using Dagum Gini coefficient and variance decomposition.Finally,the paper employs the secondary assignment procedure(QAP)to empirically examine the formation mechanism.The results go as below:The overall level of common affluence in China is low but shows a stable rising trend,and the overall spatial pattern shows the stepped decreasing trend of the eastern region—the central region—the western region and high in the north and low in the south.The differences in common affluence levels show a fluctuating and narrowing trend,with the east-west differences mainly coming from inter-regional differences and the north-south differences mainly coming from intra-regional differences.The differences in productivity and people’s well-being are the main structural sources of the differences in common affluence in China.Productivity,people’s well-being,development guarantee,development opportunities and income distribution all have positive and decreasing effects on the overall differences in common affluence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222