检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王荣淋 WANG Ronglin(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042
出 处:《浙江万里学院学报》2023年第5期36-41,共6页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University
摘 要:实质性相似是判断著作权侵权的关键。理论与实务对于实质性相似的判定规则相对分散,给司法审理带来困扰。以《人民的名义》著作权侵权纠纷案为研究对象,结合学说与司法裁判,研究实质性相似判定的方法:定位作品的主题,确认争议作品的相似部分,以抽象法区分思想与表达,过滤剔除非独创性表达,对比独创性表达,衡量实质性相似的独创性表达的占比,最终确定是否构成实质性相似。Substantial similarity is the key point to judge copyright infringement.The judgment rules of substantial similarity are relatively scattered in the corresponding theory and practice,which brings troubles to the judicial trial.Taking the infringement case of In the Name of People as the research object,combined with theories and judicial judgments,this paper proposed a method for determining the substantial similarity of such cases:locating the theme of the works,confirming the similar parts of the disputed works,distinguishing ideas and expressions with abstract methods,filtering and eliminating nonoriginal expressions,comparing the original expressions,measuring the proportion of substantially similar original expressions,and finally to determine whether they are substantially similar.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7