检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李梦云 Li Mengyun
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院
出 处:《南大法学》2023年第5期85-102,共18页NanJing University Law Journal
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“数字经济下我国劳动法面临的挑战与转型研究”(项目编号:19CFX077)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:多主体用工背景下,劳动关系归属与用人单位责任分配问题成为劳动者权益保障的主要阻碍。构建我国劳动法刺破用人单位面纱制度具有现实必要性。比较分析可知,美国刺破面纱理论在劳动法中的扩张适用,能够解决多主体用工中的雇主确定和雇主责任分配问题。美国联邦劳动法对雇主概念的扩张,单一雇主理论和联合雇主理论的发展与适用,为我国刺破面纱理论在劳动法中的适用提供了有益借鉴。因此,应当贯彻倾斜保护劳动者的原则,要求对劳动者实施共同劳动管理的多个用工主体连带承担用人单位责任,以有效救济多主体用工中的从属性劳动者。Under the context of multi-subject employment,attribution of labor relations and allocation of employer liability are major obstacles to employee protection,and a system for piercing the employer's veil in Labor Law should be constructed.A comparative analysis shows that the expanded application of the US piercing the veil doctrine in Labor Law is able to address the issues of employer identification and allocation of employer liability in multi-employer employment.The expansion of the concept of employer in the US federal Labor Law,the development of the single employer doctrine and the joint employer doctrine provide useful references for China.Therefore,in order to provide relief to employees in multi-employer employment,the principle of inclined protection for workers should be implemented,requiring multiple employment entities that exercise joint labor management over workers to be jointly and severally liable for the employer liability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33