论作为备案审查对象的其他规范性文件  

On Other Normative Documents as the Object of Recording and Review

作　　者：王锴[1] WANG Kai(Law School,Beihang University,Beijing 100083,China)

机构地区：[1]北京航空航天大学法学院,北京100083

出　　处：《北京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第5期43-51,共9页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics：Social Sciences edition Edition

基　　金：国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFC3340300,2021YFC3340304)。

摘　　要：应然意义上的其他规范性文件,既不属于形式意义的法,也不属于实质意义的法。但是,长期以来,中国的许多其他规范性文件具有了实质意义上的法的性质,同时,由于缺乏规范性文件的自始无效制度,即使严重违法的其他规范性文件也不会自动失去效力。这些都使得作为备案审查对象的其他规范性文件,既不能排除那些属于实质意义上的法的其他规范性文件,也无法拒绝那些严重违法的其他规范性文件。未来应当从规范性的概念出发,只要具备应然性、受拘束性、一般性和可公开性四个特征的其他规范性文件,都应当纳入备案审查的范围,从而落实党的十八届四中全会提出的“把所有规范性文件纳入备案审查范围,依法撤销和纠正违宪违法的规范性文件,禁止地方制发带有立法性质的文件”的要求。Other normative documents that should be considered do not belong to formal law or substantive law.However,for a long time,many other normative documents in China have the nature of law in essence.At the same time,due to the lack of a system of initial invalidity for normative documents,even other normative documents that are seriously illegal will not automatically lose their validity.All these make it impossible for the other normative documents,which are the object of recording and review,to exclude those that belong to the law in essence,nor to reject those that are seriously illegal.In the future,it is necessary to start from the concept of normativity and incorporate any other normative documents that possess the four characteristics of necessity,restraint,generality,and openness into the scope of recording and review,in order to fulfil the requirements proposed by the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China to“include all normative documents in the scope of recording and review, revoke and correct unconstitutional and illegal ones in accordance with the law, and prohibit local authorities from producing and issuing documents with legislative nature”.

关 键 词：其他规范性文件 立法 内部效力 普遍约束力 备案审查 

分 类 号：D911.01[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]