滴灌脐橙产量和品质的水肥生产函数研究  

Study on water and fertilizer production function for yield and quality of navel orange under drip irrigation

作　　者：邓庆玲 崔宁博[1] 陈飞 李小孟 胡笑涛[3] 黎秋刚 官民 李明红 曾云 王燕 DENG Qingling;CUI Ningbo;CHEN Fei;LI Xiaomeng;HU Xiaotao;LI Qiugang;GUAN Min;LI Minghong;ZENG Yun;WANG Yan(State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering,College of Water Resource&Hydropower,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610065,China;Luzhou Economic Crops Station,Luzhou,Sichuan 646000,China;Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas,Ministry of Education,Northwest A&F University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学水利水电学院,水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,四川成都610065 [2]泸州市经济作物站,四川泸州646000 [3]西北农林科技大学旱区农业水土工程教育部重点实验室,陕西杨凌712100

出　　处：《干旱地区农业研究》2023年第5期80-88,共9页Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas

基　　金：(四川大学-泸州)科技创新研发项目(2019CDLZ-10)。

摘　　要：以‘纽荷尔’脐橙为试材,在2020年4月-2021年12月抽梢开花期(Ⅰ)、幼果期(Ⅱ)、果实膨大期(Ⅲ)和果实成熟期(Ⅳ)分别设置高水和低水2个亏水处理(灌水量分别为对照处理的70%和55%),高肥、中肥和低肥3个施肥处理(施肥量分别为对照处理的80%、60%和40%),以正常水肥管理为对照(CK)。CK处理Ⅰ~Ⅳ期灌水量分别为136.43、204.65、272.86、136.43 m^(3)·hm^(-2),施肥量分别为380.00、645.00、1550.00、400.00 kg·hm^(-2)。基于W×F-Jensen/Minhas/Rao模型模拟脐橙产量和品质与不同生育期耗水耗肥量的关系,进而评价模型预测性能与敏感性。研究表明:脐橙产量、单果质量和可溶性糖均对Ⅲ期水、肥亏缺最敏感;维生素C对Ⅲ期水分亏缺最敏感,对Ⅳ期肥料亏缺最敏感;可滴定酸对Ⅱ期水分亏缺最敏感,对Ⅳ期肥料变化最敏感。W×F-Jensen/Minhas/Rao模型均能较好地模拟脐橙产量(决定系数R^(2)=0.76~0.90,均方根误差RMSE=0.030~0.045,平均绝对误差AAE=0.023~0.036,建模效率EF=0.74~0.88,一致性指数dIA=0.91~0.96),其中W×F-Minhas模型表现最佳;W×F-Jensen/Minhas/Rao模型均能很好地模拟脐橙果实含水量(R^(2)=0.87~0.94,RMSE=0.010~0.011,AAE=0.008~0.009,EF=0.85~0.88,dIA=0.96~0.97),同时可较好地模拟单果质量和可滴定酸含量(R^(2)=0.54~0.65,RMSE=0.026~0.050,AAE=0.023~0.040,EF=0.42~0.65,dIA=0.86~0.92)。W×F-Minhas和W×F-Rao模型分别在模拟可溶性糖和维生素C时表现最佳,R^(2)分别为0.46和0.51。综上所述,推荐使用W×F-Minhas模型模拟脐橙产量和果实品质,以实现脐橙节水提质高效发展。‘Newhall’navel orange was used as the test material.Two water deficit levels(high and low water treatment,noted as HW and LW,and the perfusion volume was 70%and 55%of CK,respectively)and three fertilization levels(high,medium and low fertilizer,noted as HF,MF and LF,were applied at 80%,60%and 40%of CK,respectively)were set at the shoot flowering stage(Ⅰ),young fruit stage(Ⅱ),fruit expansion stage(Ⅲ)and fruit maturity stage(Ⅳ).The fertilizer application rates were 80%,60%and 40%of CK,respectively with control treatment(CK).The irrigation amounts of CK treatment were 136.43,204.65,272.86 m^(3)·hm^(-2) and 136.43 m^(3)·hm^(-2) at stage Ⅰ-Ⅳ,respectively,and the fertilizer amounts were 380.00,645.00,1550.00 kg·hm^(-2) and 400.00 kg·hm^(-2),respectively.W×F-Jensen,W×F-Minhas and W×F-Rao models were used to simulate the relationship between yield and quality of navel orange and water and fertilizer consumption at different growth stages,and to evaluate the prediction performance of the models.It was found that navel orange yield,fruit mass and soluble sugar were most sensitive to water and fertilizer deficit in stage Ⅲ.Vitamin C was most sensitive to water deficit in stage Ⅲ and fertilizer change in stage Ⅳ.Titratable acid was most sensitive to water deficit in stage Ⅰ and stage Ⅳ,and most sensitive to fertilizer change in stage Ⅳ.W×F-Jensen,W×F-Minhas and W×F-Rao models established in this study simulated navel orange yield well,with R^(2)=0.76~0.90,RMSE=0.030~0.045,AAE=0.023~0.036,EF=0.74~0.88,d IA=0.91~0.96,among which W×F-Minhas model was the best.W×F-Jensen,W×F-Minhas and W×F-Rao models could well simulate the water content of navel orange fruit,showing R^(2)=0.87~0.94,RMSE=0.010~0.011,AAE=0.008~0.009,EF=0.85~0.88,d IA=0.96~0.97,which better simulated the fruit weight and titratable acid content.R^(2)=0.54~0.65,RMSE=0.026~0.050,AAE=0.023~0.040,EF=0.42~0.65,d IA=0.86~0.92.W×F-Minhas和W×F-Rao models had the best performance when simulating soluble sugar and vitamin C,with

关 键 词：脐橙 水肥生产函数 滴灌 产量 品质 

分 类 号：S664.4[农业科学—果树学] S275.6[农业科学—园艺学]