出 处:《医学研究杂志》2023年第9期173-177,182,共6页Journal of Medical Research
摘 要:目的评估在俯卧位下行腰椎后路手术的患者使用反比通气(inverse ratio ventilation,IRV)对肺部呼吸力学及术后并发症的影响。方法将60例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级择期行腰椎后路手术的患者随机分为两组,即容量控制通气(volume-controlled ventilation,VCV)组和容量控制的反比通气(IRV-VC)组。麻醉诱导后所有患者先使用VCV模式,I∶E=1∶2,俯卧位后VCV组保持不变,IRV-VC组改为I∶E=2∶1。在麻醉诱导后5min(T_(0))、俯卧位5min(T_(1))、俯卧位30min(T_(2))、俯卧位1h(T_(3))以及手术结束时(T_(4))测量呼吸力学、动脉血气和血流动力学参数,并记录术后直至出院期间的肺部并发症。结果IRV-VC组在T_(2)~T_(4)的动态肺顺应性(dynamic lung compliance,Cdyn)、平均气道压(mean airway pressure,Pmean)和内源性呼气末正压(intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure,iPEEP)均高于VCV组,气道峰压(peak airway pressure,Ppeak)和气道平台压(plateau airway pressure,Pplat)均低于VCV组(P<0.05);手术结束时动脉血氧分压(partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood,PaO_(2))和氧合指数(oxygenation index,OI)高于VCV组(P<0.05),肺泡-动脉血氧分压差(alveolar-artery oxygen partial pressure gradient,A-aDO_(2))和生理无效腔率(V_(D)/V_(T))均低于VCV组(P<0.05)。两组在术后肺部并发症发生率方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在俯卧位行腰椎后路手术中使用IRV,可以改善肺部呼吸力学,增加氧合,但并不能减少术后肺部并发症。Objective To evaluate the effects of inverse ratio ventilation(IRV)on pulmonary respiratory mechanics and postoperative complications in patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery in prone position.Methods Sixty patients with ASAⅠ-Ⅱundergoing elective posterior lumbar surgery were randomly divided into two groups:volume-controlled ventilation group(VCV group)and volume-controlled inverse ventilation group(IRV-VC group).After anesthesia induction,all patients initially ventilated with the VCV.After placement in the prone position,the VCV group remained unchanged,and the I∶E of IRV-VC group adjusted to 2∶1.The respiratory mechanics,arterial blood gases,and hemodynamic parameters were measured at 5min after induction of anesthesia(T_(0)),5min in prone position(T_(1)),30min in prone position(T_(2)),1h in prone position(T_(3))and at the end of surgery(T_(4)).Pulmonary complications were recorded from postoperative to discharge.Results The dynamic lung compliance(Cdyn),mean airway pressure(Pmean)and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure(iPEEP)of IRV-VC group at T_(2)to T_(4)were were higher than those of VCV group,while peak airway pressure(Ppeak)and plateau airway pressure(Pplat)were lower than those of VCV group(P<0.05).At T_(4),the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood(PaO_(2))and oxygenation index(OI)of IRV-VC group were significantly higher than those of VCV group(P<0.05),while alveolar-artery oxygen partial pressure gradient(A-aDO_(2))and V_(D)/V_(T)was lower than those of VCV group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion IRV could improve pulmonary respiratory mechanics and increase oxygenation,but does not reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery in prone position.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...