五山文学二手文献引起的流行假象与汉文水平问题——比较文学文献学示例  

An Example of Comparative Literature Philology: The Problems of Popular Misconcep⁃tions and Proficiency in Classical Chinese Caused by Secondhand Gozan Literature

作　　者：张哲俊 Zhang Zhejun(Sichuan University,China Comparative Literature of East Asia)

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院

出　　处：《日语学习与研究》2023年第4期1-12,共12页Journal of Japanese Language Study and Research

摘　　要：五山文学中存在一些经常提及的中国诗人与书目,这给人以五山诗人阅读了很多中国书目的印象。这种印象带入到研究,就会影响研究结果。只有以校注方式排查五山诗人的阅读印迹,才能发现人红、书红的流行假象。产生流行假象是因为诗人经常使用类书、诗话等二手文献,有人以为五山诗人查阅类书才能写诗,由此会产生五山诗人汉文水平当低下的看法。但五山诗人写了不少走笔、口号类诗歌,不查二手文献也可以写诗,汉文水平没有那么低下。There are certain Chinese poets and bibliographies that are frequently mentioned by Gozan poets in Gozan literature,creating the impression that Gozan poets must have extensively read Chinese bibliographies.However,this impression,when applied to research,can impact the study's results.Only by examining the footprints of the Gozan poets through textual annotations can we uncover the popular misconceptions about the fame of individuals and the popularity of certain books.The emergence of such popular misconceptions is attributed to the poets'frequent usage of secondary sources like reference books and poetic discourse.Some people mistakenly believe that the Gozan poets could only write poetry by consulting these secondary sources,leading to the notion that their proficiency in Classical Chinese was inferior.However,the Gozan poets have composed a considerable number of spontaneous and slogan-like poems,which do not require consulting secondary sources,indicating that their proficiency in Classical Chinese was not as low as presumed.

关 键 词：五山诗人 阅读书目 二手文献 汉文水平 

分 类 号：I313.06[文学—其他各国文学]