数字新兴议题专门立法热之反思  

Reflection on the Fever of Specialized Legislation on Digital Emerging Issues

作　　者：傅爱竹 Fu Aizhu

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院

出　　处：《法商研究》2023年第5期47-61,共15页Studies in Law and Business

基　　金：山东大学人文社会科学创新团队“全面依法治国战略实施中的数据运用与数据治理创新团队”资助建设项目。

摘　　要：数字技术的广泛应用衍生出名目繁多的新兴议题,是否需要以及如何将之法律化是数字时代的新“马法之问”。国内主流舆论与实践倾向于采取专门立法,但其理由难以支持该法律化路径的必要性与正当性。作为专门立法热潮形成的底层逻辑,“技术风险焦虑症”与“社会工程学思维”蕴藏着对法律规制新技术风险之功能与限度的重大误解。应借鉴“零星的社会工程”作为数字新兴议题法律化路径抉择的基本思路。通过构建由一系列基础规则与例外规则组成的评估框架,即明确释法、修法、专门立法、合并立法等路径的优先顺位及逸脱规则,可以为数字新兴议题法律化路径之抉择提供具体且客观的评判标准。The widespread use of digital technology has given rise to a wide range of emerging issues,whether and how to legalize them is the new"horse law question"of the digital age.Domestic mainstream opinion and practice tend to adopt a specialized legislative approach,but the grounds do not support the necessity and legitimacy of this legalization path.As the underlying logic of the special legislation fever,Technological Risk Anxiety and Social Engineering Thinking contain major misunderstanding of the functions and limits of legal regulation of new technological risks.The Piecemeal Social Engineering should be taken as the basic idea for the choice of the path of legalization of digital emerging issues.By constructing an assessment framework consisting of a series of basic rules and exception rules,and clarifying the priority of the paths of law interpretation,law amendment,specialized legislation,and consolidated legislation,as well as the rules for escaping from specific paths,we can provide specific and objective criteria for deciding the path of legalization of digital emerging issues.

关 键 词：数字新兴议题 法律化 专门立法 社会工程 

分 类 号：TP399-C2[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术] D912.1[自动化与计算机技术—计算机科学与技术]