探讨未成年运动员在兴奋剂检查程序中的权利保障——基于瓦利耶娃案的考察  

Exploring the Protection of Minors’Stimulant Rights in Doping Control Process:Based on Case of Valieva

作　　者：谢可欣 张利民[1] XIE Kexin;ZHANG Limin(Kenneth Wang School of Law,Soochow University,Suzhou Jiangsu,215006)

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《湖北体育科技》2023年第9期770-776,833,共8页Hubei Sports Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(17BTY068)。

摘　　要：反兴奋剂工作在体育赛事中一直处于重要地位,其有效开展应当建立在运动员程序权利保障的基础之上。瓦利耶娃案是参赛资格的临时仲裁案件,也是北京2022年冬奥会涉及兴奋剂的典型案件。本文运用案例分析法、文献资料法、比较法等,对整个案件进行梳理,并结合裁决的要旨,分别对“受保护人员”兴奋剂违规处罚的特殊规则、运动员过错程度的认定以及临时措施的适用规则进行分析;认为相关机构可以从平衡反兴奋剂与运动员基本人权的关系、加强对未成年运动员的保护、保障反兴奋剂法律程序的正当性方面完善当前反兴奋剂工作,并为我国推动落实反兴奋剂仲裁机制的完善提出相应建议。Anti-doping work has always been in an important position in sports events,and its effective development should be based on the protection of athletes’procedural rights.The essence of Valieva case is an ad hoc arbitration case for the eligibility to participate in the competition,and it is also a typical case involving doping in the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics.Case analysis,literature review and comparison are used to sort out the whole case,and combined with the gist of the award,the paper analyzes the jurisdiction of CAS ad hoc arbitration tribunal over the case,the special rules of doping violation punishment for protected persons,the determination of athletes’fault degree and the applicable rules of temporary measures.It is believed that relevant institutions can improve the current anti-doping work from the aspects of balancing the relationship between anti-doping and athletes’basic human rights,strengthening the protection of minor athletes and ensuring the legitimacy of anti-doping legal procedures,and corresponding suggestions are put forward to promote the improvement of anti-doping arbitration mechanism in China.

关 键 词：未成年人 参赛资格 体育仲裁 反兴奋剂 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]