农业科技论文“材料与方法”模块科学性的编辑鉴审策略  

Editing and Reviewing Strategies for the Scientificity of the"Materials and Methods"Section of Agricultural Sci-Tech Papers

作　　者：张梅 翁志辉[1,2] ZHANG Mei;WENG Zhihui(Editorial Department of Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences;Institute of Agricultural Economics and Technology Information,Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

机构地区：[1]《福建农业学报》编辑部 [2]福建省农业科学院农业经济与科技信息研究所

出　　处：《出版与印刷》2023年第4期68-74,共7页Publishing & Printing

基　　金：2023年度中国农业期刊网研究基金(编号CAJW2023-060);福建省农业科学院“知识服务与科技评价”创新团队建设专项(编号CXTD2021017-2)。

摘　　要：探讨农业科技论文“材料与方法”模块写作中存在的问题和编辑鉴审策略,提高农业科技期刊的学术质量与编辑水平。文章结合编辑实践,总结鉴审农业科技论文“材料与方法”模块科学性的基本要素,从学术性和规范性两个方面分析“材料与方法”模块常见的科学性问题,并提出实现农业科技论文“材料与方法”模块质量把控与提升的四项编辑鉴审策略:厚实知识储备,提升审查能力;选择对口审稿专家,多维度学术把关;引导作者科学规范写作,减少差错率;严格审查返修稿,确保修改内容的真实性。The article explores the problems and the editing and reviewing strategies in the writing of the"Materials and Methods"section in agricultural sci-tech papers,in order to improve the academic quality and editorial level of agricultural sci-tech journals.Based on editorial practice,the article summarizes the essential elements for evaluating the scientificity of the"Materials and Methods"section in agricultural sci-tech papers,analyzes the common errors related to scientificity in the"Materials and Methods"section from the perspectives of academic rigor and standardization,and proposes four strategies for the quality control and improvement of the"Materials and Methods"section in agricultural sci-tech papers:building a solid knowledge base to enhance reviewing capabilities;selecting the expert reviewers in the relevant fields for multidimensional academic scrutiny;guiding the authors in scientific and standardized writing to reduce the error rates;conducting the strict review,verification,and revision of manuscripts to ensure the authenticity of modifications.

关 键 词：农业科技论文 材料与方法 同行评议 编辑鉴审 

分 类 号：G232[文化科学]