ORCID在数字出版中的应用分析  

Application analysis of ORCID in digital publishing

作　　者：颜永松 王维朗[1] 薛婧媛[1] YAN Yongsong;WANG Weiang;XUE Jingyuan(Journals Department of Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China)

机构地区：[1]重庆大学期刊社,重庆400044

出　　处：《计算机应用文摘》2023年第19期141-144,共4页Chinese Journal of Computer Application

基　　金：2022年施普林格·自然-中国高校科技期刊研究会英文编辑及国际交流人才培养基金研究项目(CUJS-GJHZ-2022-17);重庆市社会科学规划英才计划项目(2022YC006);教育部产学合作协同育人项目(JYB202002325067)。

摘　　要：随着数字的出版快速发展,在期刊、图书、预印本和网络出版物等海量出版物中区分相同名字的学术成果成为业内的研究热点之一。作为一种较为常用的研究者唯一标识,ORCID在出版界中得到了广泛应用,但在其注册和使用过程中也伴随着一些争议,如过多的空白账户、强制作者注册等。文章结合ORCID在数字出版中的应用,深入分析其为研究者及学术社区带来的优势及在使用过程中存在的问题,旨在为学者提供有益的参考。With the rapid development of digital publishing,it has become one of the research hotspots in the industry to distinguish academic achievements with the same name in a large number of publications,such as journals,books,preprints and online publications.As a commonly used unique identifier for researchers,ORCID has been widely used in the publishing industry,but there are also some controversial issues in the process of its registration and use,such as too many blank accounts,compulsory author registration and so on.Based on the application of ORCID in digital publishing,this paper analyzes the advantages of ORCID for researchers and academic communities and the problems in its use,aiming to provide useful reference for scholars.

关 键 词：ORCID 数字出版 应用 争议 

分 类 号：G230[文化科学]