嵇康《管蔡论》与魏晋之际政治斗争——兼论《管蔡论》被误读之理路与渊源  

Ji Kang’s Guan Cai Lun and the Political Struggle between the Wei and Jin Dynasties:On the Reason and Origin of Misreading Guan Cai Lun

作　　者：吴怀东[1] 王雅娴 WU Huaidong;WANG Yaxian(College of Liberal Arts,Anhui University,Hefei 230039,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学文学院,安徽合肥230039

出　　处：《安徽史学》2023年第5期14-21,共8页Historical Research In Anhui

基　　金：教育部古委会直接资助项目“《诗比兴笺》校疏”(1202)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：曹魏甘露元年,被司马氏扶持上台却欲有所振作的魏帝曹髦,亲临太学,提出“郑王之争”以及“圣人”“知人”等“时代之问”以考诸博士,这是一桩著名的学术兼政治“公案”。嵇康当时就在洛阳,其作《管蔡论》,不仅精准触及太学问对的隐秘玄机,并试图化解曹髦提出的疑而未解的“圣人之失”与“圣人之明”之内在矛盾,含蓄地表现出感情立场和政治倾向。嵇康暧昧隐晦的政治态度是当时政局下文士的普遍心态。所谓《管蔡论》表明嵇康“讥切司马”,乃至做出极端政治斗争行为,实属误读,亦有其理路与根源。In the first year of Ganlu of the Cao Wei Dynasty,emperor Cao Mao,who was supported by Sima but wanted to save the political situation,came to the Taixue and proposed“the academic dispute between Zheng Xuan and Wang Su”,“Saint”,“Talent appointment”and other questions of the times to ask the doctor of Taixue,and the problem could not be solved on the spot.This was a famous academic and political case.Ji Kang as a contemporary cultural celebrity in Luoyang at that time,he published Guan Cai Lun later on,which not only accurately touched the hidden mystery,but also solved the inner contradiction between“Saint’s error”and“Saint’s wisdom”,which Cao Mao wondered but did not solve,he also implicitly expressed the political position of thought and emotion.Ji Kang’s obscure political attitude was the common mentality of the literati at that time.The so-called Guan Cai Lun showed that Ji Kang“rebelling against Sima”,and even extreme acts of political warfare,it is a misreading,but there is logic and origin behind the misreading.

关 键 词：嵇康 《管蔡论》 曹髦 太学问对 政治站队 误读 

分 类 号：K236.1[历史地理—历史学]