汉语活用名转动词双宾句加工中构式压制的ERP研究  

On Constructional Coercion in the Processing of Chinese Novel Denominal Verb Double-Object Sentence:An ERP Study

作　　者：张华 王小潞 高晨阳 冯丽萍[4] Zhang Hua;Wang Xiaolu;Gao Chenyang;Feng Liping(School of Foreign Language Studies,Ningbo Tech University,Ningbo Zhejiang 315000;School of Foreign Languages,Hangzhou City University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310015;School of International Education,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488;School of International Chinese Language Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875)

机构地区：[1]浙大宁波理工学院外国语学院,浙江宁波315000 [2]浙大城市学院外国语学院,浙江杭州310015 [3]中国社会科学院大学国际教育学院,北京102488 [4]北京师范大学国际中文教育学院,北京100875

出　　处：《语言科学》2023年第4期337-353,共17页Linguistic Sciences

基　　金：浙江省教育厅一般项目(Y202146763);浙大宁波理工学院院内基金(20201203Z0170)的资助。

摘　　要：本研究采用ERP技术,以无压制(三价动词)、可压制(与“传递”义相关的名词活用做动词)和不可压制(与“传递”义无关的名词活用做动词)三类双宾句为实验材料,选取“V/NV+了”、NP1和NP2三个关键词,考察三类双宾句加工中V/NV与构式义的互动过程。ERP实验结果发现,在“V/NV+了”和NP1后,可压制和不可压制句之间的N400/P600没有显著差异。NP2后的397-709 ms,无压制、可压制和不可压制句之间的持续性负波(SAN)两两差异显著:不可压制句诱发的SAN最大,无压制句的SAN最小,因三类句子间动词/名转动词与构式义的语义关联不同,这表明此时双宾构式义开始参与句子语义整合。NP2后在718-782 ms,不可压制句诱发出最大的晚期负波,显著区别于无压制句和可压制句,表明可压制句和无压制句都完成了句子语义整合而不可压制句无法完成句子语义整合。从双宾句的加工过程看,可压制句和不可压制句的加工在NP2后出现显著的差异,主要在于两类名转动词与构式义的语义关联不同,此研究结果表明汉语存在独立于动词的双宾构式义,如果进入结构的词项的语义特征与构式的关键特征相匹配,构式压制就能实现。Based on the ERP technology and choosing“RP te le”,NP1 and NP2 as the keywords,this study explores the process of interaction between the V/Nv and the constructional meaning during the comprehension of the three types of Chinese double-object sentences(CDO),covering the normal sentences in which trivalent verbs are used as the predicate,coerced sentences in which nouns relevant to the meaning of“transmission”are used as verbs and incoercible sentences in which nouns irrelevant to the meaning of“transmission”are used as verbs.The results of the ERP experiment show that after“hat afle”and NP1,the N400 and P600 between the coerced sentences and incoercible sentences are not significantly different.During NP2397-709 ms,Sustained Anterior Negativity(SAN)evoked by the three types of sentences respectively is significantly different:SAN evoked by the incoercible sentences is the largest,while SAN evoked by the normal is the smallest.As the three types V/Nv have different relations with the CDO constructional meaning,this result shows the involvement of constructional meaning in sentence semantic integration.During NP2718-782 ms,the incoercible sentences evoke the largest late negativity(LN),which is significantly different from the LN of the normal and coerced sentences.This observation indicates that the normal and coerced sentences rather than the incoercible sentences bring about the semantic integration.From the processing of the whole CDO,the differences resulted from the processing of incoercible and coerced sentences after NP2 are mainly caused by the two types of Nvs having different relation with the CDO constructional meaning.The ERP results have provided evidence for the existence of CDO constructional meaning independent of the verb.Constructional coercion can be successful as long as the semantic characteristics of lexical items match the constructional meaning.

关 键 词：活用名转动词 双宾 构式义 ERP 

分 类 号：H146.3[语言文字—汉语]