检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李海鹏 宁文杰[2] 王予江[3] 王伟 宋伟静 王梦梦 LI Haipeng;NING Wenjie;WANG Yujiang;WANG Wei;SONG Weijing;WANG Mengmeng(Qiaoxi Hospital of Stomatology,Shijiazhuang 050000,China;HIFU Treatment Room,the Forth Hospital of Shijiazhuang;Hospital of Stomatological Affiliated to Nanchang University)
机构地区:[1]石家庄市桥西区口腔医院,石家庄市050000 [2]石家庄市第四医院海扶治疗室 [3]南昌大学附属口腔医院
出 处:《中国激光医学杂志》2023年第4期198-202,239,共6页Chinese Journal of Laser Medicine & Surgery
基 金:河北省医学科学研究重点课题(20201307)。
摘 要:目的比较CO_(2)激光与传统手术刀治疗上唇系带修整的疗效。方法选取2021年1月至2021年10月,上唇系带附着异常患者30例,按照随机数字表随机分为激光组和常规组,每组患者各15例。激光组采用CO_(2)激光行上唇系带修整术,切割功率2 W;常规组采用传统手术刀行上唇系带修整术,比较两组的手术操作时间、术中出血情况及愈合时间,术后1 d、3 d、7 d、14 d时,患者根据自我感觉采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS)法^([5]),记录患者术后疼痛VAS值。结果激光组平均手术操作时间(3.25±0.4)min明显小于常规组(12.7±0.8)min,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。激光组15例患者术中均无出血,而常规组15例患者术中均存在出血,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。激光组的手术操作时间、术中出血、术后1 d及术后3 d的疼痛均评分低于常规组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。常规组平均愈合时间(10.5±0.9)d小于激光组(17.3±0.2)d,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后14 d时,两组患者创口处均愈合良好,均未出现不良反应。系带附着均向根冠方向方移动至膜龈联合处。结论CO_(2)激光行上唇系带修整术与传统手术刀术式相比手术操作时间更短、术中基本无出血、术后早期疼痛反应更小。可以作为上唇系带修整术的一种可选方案。Objective To compare the effect to trim upper lip frenulum with CO_(2) laser and traditional scalpels.Methods Thirty patients suffered abnormal upper lip frenulum attachment and given oral and maxillofacial surgery in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into a laser group(n=15) and routine group(n=15).The patients in the laser group were given CO_(2) laser-based upper lip frenulum repair(power:2 W),and those in the conventional group were trimmed with traditional scalpels.The operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative pain and healing time were compared between the two groups.Results The average operation time of the laser group and conventional group was(3.25±0.4) min and(12.7±0.8) min respectively,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).While no bleeding being found in the laser group,all the 15patients in the conventional group has bleeding.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The performance of the laser group in operation time,bleeding during operation and post-operation 1 d and 3 d pain was better than that of the conventional group,and the difference is statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions Compared with traditional scalpel surgery,the upper lip frenulum trimming with CO_(2) laser has such advantages as shorter operation time,almost no bleeding during operation,and less pain response in the early postoperative period.It is thus recommended as an option for upper lip frenulum trimming.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171