检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李杰 Li Jie
机构地区:[1]苏州科技大学历史学系
出 处:《政治思想史》2023年第3期49-61,198,共14页Journal of the History of Political Thought
基 金:国家社会科学基金中国历史研究院重大历史问题研究专项2022年度重大招标项目“世界古代早期国家形态比较研究”(22VLS012)的阶段成果。
摘 要:希波战争时期,雅典通过强调波斯对希腊的蹂躏和奴役,宣扬自身捍卫希腊自由的正义与勇气,逐渐建构出以文明与野蛮、自由与奴役为要素的“反波斯”话语体系;雅典的“反波斯”话语在鼓励希腊人支持“反波斯”事业的同时,深化了他们对雅典在希腊联盟中领导权的认可。希波战争后,在“向波斯复仇”的辞令掩饰下,雅典积极向外扩张,及至伯罗奔尼撒战争前夕,“强权即公理”成为雅典奴役盟邦和建立帝国的话语基础。公元前5世纪雅典对外战争话语的演进理路,在某种意义上表征着雅典从城邦到帝国的发展轨迹,也是其时希腊世界政治局势变迁的指示器。During the period of the Persian War,Athens gradually constructed an“anti-Persian”discourse system with elements of civilization and barbarism,freedom and slavery,by emphasizing Persia’s oppression and enslavement of Greece,and promoting its own justice and courage in defending Greek freedom.Athenian“anti-Persian”discourse not only encouraged Greeks to support the“anti-Persian”cause,but also deepened their recognition of Athens’leadership in the Greek alliance.After the Persian War,under the guise of“revenge against Persia”,Athens actively expanded outward.On the eve of the Peloponnesian War,“might is right”became the basis of discourse for Athens to enslave its allies and establish its empire.The evolution of Athens’discourse on foreign wars in the fifth century BC,in a sense,represented the developmental trajectory of Athens from a city-state to an empire,and was also an indicator of the changes of the political situation in Greece at that time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7